

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Is it a loop hole, is it a trade rule, we’ll never find out. What’s certain is:
“You are going to have to hire thousands and thousands of more customs officers if you want to scrap the exemption,” Riedenstein warned. “It’s going to cost the US and the EU to punish Beijing for taking advantage of these legal loopholes.”
The future is just one huge contradiction. Buckle up.
As it stands, the party’s promise of a consistent China policy means a panda-hugging approach.
Oh man, to read something like this from an Oxford publication is disheartening.
This anti intellectual approach can be witnessed all over this piece:
In recent years, the EU has increasingly recognised China’s geoeconomic playbook and has adopted a more defensive posture. The bloc has emphasised “de-risking” from China, as demonstrated by its newly imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and a crackdown on Chinese e-commerce imports.
Does this really mean anything? These 100 Billion will be scraped together from a) an already existing fund, b) prospective funds from member states, c) prospective income from carbon taxation and d) private funding.
Also they want to spend 500 Billion for defense and it’s even less clear where that money will come from.
Unless…
Oh man, I want to get off this ride
“As the front bench spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats knows, that is not our plan, and we are clear that net migration needs to come down.
“It quadrupled under the previous Conservative government in the space of just four years. Those numbers need to come down.”
And this is the fucking statement.
I mean, it can’t be that hard to change the idiotic message. We just need to find the master tape of what’s been handed out to all those amplifiers and erase it.
Oh. That’s a lot. Resources, knowledge and products.
How are we going to do this?
For example, what is Europe supposed to do if it doesn’t have as much rare earths in their territory as they would like to refine? And at the same time not become too (whenever that threshold is reached) dependant on someone who has?
What kind of dependencies are you thinking about?
Something, something…Roger Stone
Hier ist der Wahlomat: Mach dich auf die Socken und dein Kreuz bei Die Linke.
Lettuce calm down
There is nothing in the article that supports its headline’s claim. Not a word about Russia building up its forces and combat capabilities. Let alone for a NATO confrontation.
Nice try. The Uk did that like a week ago.
I think it already happened. He mentioned that there might be something up with the bonds just a week ago. Luckily he was quiet since then.
Maybe a good idea to get cultural treasures out of the country
Yeah, no, don’t frame it like you’re a victim of pro China trolls. You post mostly any anti China material you can get your hands on, so don’t freak out if people are critical with some.