Hello my lovelies 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

I’m your favourite poisoned princess with a heart black as night and rife with sorrow. 🖤

Im non-binary, an my pronouns are they/them/whatever/you/want, I am passionate on anti-consumerism and feminism, and believe in pacifism and mutualism. 🏳️

My hobbies and interests include (but are not limited to) motorcycles, mycology, writing, reading, craftsmanship, and computing. 🥰

I’m based in the south west of England. 🩵

  • 2 Posts
  • 88 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 18th, 2026

help-circle

  • H4RL3Y@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLinux@lemmy.mlis LTT a good channel?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Also, their attitude towards Linux has always been unncecessarily hostile; with Linus refusing to respect that he has to learn how to use a different operating system and just treating it like Windows which will naturally lead to instability and crashes.

    If you were to treat macOS like Windows the same would happen too.


  • H4RL3Y@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLinux@lemmy.mlis LTT a good channel?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I used to watch them, but overtime they’ve become super corporate with none of the authenticity of the older videos; and also basically everyone I used to watch for has left.

    Then there was the whole situation with the sexual harrasment stuff that just put the final nail in the coffin for me.

    Every time it appears now in my feed its just so clearly clickbait view slop with no personality. They haven’t done anything like the large-scale projects like they used to in a long time.






  • Salmonella

    You cook them, solved.

    High choleserol

    You don’t base your diet on 100% eggs, limiting your diet to any one food will be damaging regardless.

    Prostate cancer

    Sure, higher risk, from what baseline? Varies massively per-person, and people’s risk-tolerance is subjective… Personally I don’t really care.

    Diabetes

    Again, significantly higher chance, from what baseline? 0.02 is 100% higher than 0.01, misleading.






  • H4RL3Y@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.worldGotta have my bacon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    Well unfortunately you haven’t got what you wanted, you clearly have a very simple view on nutrition, and a concerning lack of intelligence.

    What is an egg? It is a vessel to grow a living organism in a self-contained environment, providing all the resources needed to do so.

    Resources such as:

    • Vitamins
    • Amino-acids
    • Antioxidants
    • Healthy, unsaturated fats

    If an egg was so bad for your health, I ask you quite simply, how the hell do they support a chick during a very intense time of rapid growth?

    That’s like saying being in a womb is unhealthy for a developing foetus.

    Please, next time, perhaps try updating your knowledge to something a bit more modern than WW2 before “jumping in and correcting” anyone again. With the constant stream of AI slop onto the internet, the last thing we need is human slop too.




  • Again, scale.

    How much of the meat produced is actually eaten? What’s the chance for each garment produced to actually be worn more than once?

    The current system can downsize significantly without needing to raise prices, as we’re already in a significant surplus.

    The point at which products are no longer guaranteed due to demand is when the prices have to go up.


  • H4RL3Y@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.worldGotta have my bacon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    18 days ago

    As much as I find chickens, and all avians in general, cute and I find it sickening the way they are treated… I do love eggs, they’re tasty, versatile, easy to cook, and unbelievably healthy.

    I think the differential we have to identify is one thing, and that is scale.

    I am not a vegan, I do not believe it is wrong to consume animals or animal-sourced products, however I do support animal welfare and believe that if we are to raise livestock for consumption they should be treated as the sentient, thinking, feeling creatures that they are and cared for accordingly.

    Imagine instead of human and animal rights we just had “sentient rights”, for example.

    Being able to test for sentience is a topic in and of itself, and out of scope for my argument.

    I think there is no harm done in, a hypothetical world where people had the space to do such a thing, raising our own livestock, limited to individual homesteads or the immediate settlement (a local town market, for example).

    The line where it becomes unethical is quite obvious really, are the animals treated as living things, or machines to simply fuel and feed to grow them for slaughter and harvest? Yes, in my example of fair treatment the goal may be to raise them for eventual slaughter, but its their lifelong treatment where this applies, not the overall objective.