I’m so happy people didn’t vote for Kamala.

/s

Yeah, I got the text from Hegseth when it happened. They’re clear on OPSEC though.

Thank you for the details - as you point out this is a functionally useless definition.

It reeks of “You know what I mean - that bad stuff”. And that’s not a good scientific definition.

A product containing more than five ingredients is likely to be ultra-processed

Curry is “ultra-processed” - you heard it hear first.

Like I said - “Sports are dangerous” is a very bad way to try to categorize risky activity. Golf and football are very different as are Curry and Twizzlers.

Those are shit definitions that come from pop-science not real science. They’re so broad as to be functionally useless.

It’s astonishing to me that scientists are using such unscientific terms like “ultra processed food”. What is it about these foods that is unhealthy?

It’s like saying “sports are dangerous” while including football and golf in your definition.

I see he’s shifting from “it’s so easy I can do it in a day” to “it’s impossible and will be a monumental achievement if I can do it”.

Y’all answering “what” to a “why” question.

The ones who were living there when they were invaded or the ones who are still alive?

Why talk about it at all though? What military benefits from telling the press about its newest weapons?

“Secret workshop”? Why are they talking openly to the press then?

Okay RFK.

Generally it’s the people who you want to be. It’s not about “color”.

“I don’t think it’s a stretch” and “they have a PR department” are not “evidence”.

This comment proves the church’s PR experiment worked. The lies worked. He wasn’t progressive, he was a hard conservative,

This phrase, right here, sounds like it came from a conspiracy theorist. Because that’s exactly how conspiracy theorists rationalize things. Anything that counters my belief is “lies” and it’s just a “PR experiment”. It can’t possibly be that the pope is, like most people, complex with varied beliefs and potentially even contradictory beliefs.

No. It’s “lies from a PR department”. 🙄

Proof of things “A” is not proof of things “B”

As of Aprill 8.

This comment proves the church’s PR experiment worked.

Conspiracy theorists are so weird… Like do you imagine a smokey room with the pope and a group of cardinals talking about how they want to represent the church in a completely opposite way to how they want it to be? Or is there a “shadow church” that controls it all and the pope is unaware?

Which marvel movie best reflects the situation do you think?

Yeah - turns out it’s going to be hard to do so why bother. Who knew it would be so difficult to get two countries literally at war with each other to just stop?

Statisticians know that things with a one in a hundred chance can happen more than once in a hundred years. Or less…

Flip a coin - you may get heads twice in a row even though there is only a one in two chance of getting heads.