I think it just means an occupation ie something you do to earn money – as opposed to the jobs we do around the house in the course of taking care of ourselves. Regardless yes it’s inane. (we should be eating healthy tho, regardless of religious affiliation)
It’s not cowardice, it’s intentional. He wants a timeline where techno-lords with divine authority oversee their vassal states and nations are a thing of the past. Bending over for a fascist party is the fastest way to get there.
You can put videos in a text thread. I’m on a 31-person thread that has been active for about 15 years. I promise there’s no shortage of videos.
Try to get them to text them instead. Giant family text chains are a lot more fun (and chaotic) than generic social media.
thanks, fixed.
Lol, but there are lots of applications for nondeterministic computing that are not LLMs. Some of the famous-y ones would be like Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), which is used in reinforcement learning (e.g., AlphaGo) to explore game trees probabilistically, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), where you use randomness to sample from complex distributions (e.g., Bayesian inference), and zero-knowledge proofs, where you use randomness to verify information without revealing it. You could probably get an LLM to make a longer list :)
This is it literally. (granted I’m sure there are other use cases, but you know they’re following those AI-dollars)
I’m still using that mouse, with a 9-pin to ps2 and a ps2 to usb
it’s just practice.
At least you tried.
I’m down. We should invite some of the solarpunk instance guys.
ex- google exec
Damn I’ve only tried 1 out of 6, no wonder I feel terrible.
So every AI’s gonna identify as an Arch user with striped socks now?
Ok reading a little more the class has been certified but it hasn’t gone to trial, so there’s still a possibility of a closed-door settlement of some sort, though given the number of parties involved that seems unlikely. Maybe I’m just being optimistic. But if it goes to trial and makes it to judgement there will either have to be cases where using copyrighted materials to train AI (which seriously how is that not for generating derivative works) is found to be ok, or copyright will be held sacrosanct and the whole gen AI industry will have to pay… something. Punitive damages would make the industry cease to exist overnight, and I’d bet most publishers would prefer a check instead.
It has to set some precedent though. Either there are valid reasons to violate copyright are there aren’t.
There have been scarier graphs in the 2020s 🙄
Yeah for all his shortcomings Pat Gelsinger had the right plan for Intel. But the board wanted to see the numbers go up every quarter – long-term viability be damned – and he couldn’t do both that and push all of their advanced engineering directives, so something had to give (which in this case was Gelsinger himself).
There’s plenty of evidence of homosexuality across broad swaths of the animal kingdom, but gender is a human social construct (until the apes and whales tell us otherwise) so I don’t know how this would even translate to any other animals.