

I don’t think this answers the question
I don’t think this answers the question
What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?
You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them
I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested
This isn’t my article and yes that’s controlled for
I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination
Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?
Thank you for your considered and articulate comment
What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not
Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?
Every time I see a comment like this I lost a little more faith in lemmy
No it doesn’t
Not really. In California it’s called a smog check
And many American states do not have any kind of mandatory inspection
The UK MOT covers a lot more than just emissions. The vehicle needs to have appropriate tyre tread, windscreen in safe working order, no check engine light, etc. And mileage is recorded to reduce potential for fraud. Many other things are checked.
This is a stupid take, equally as stupid as saying “I’m not pro BLM because I believe that all lives matter” (for the same reason)
Lots of refreshingly, considered takes on Lemmy today
“everyone should take hallucinogens” is a way more legitimate take, backed by science
This is such a stupid take, the author is either a lemming or doesn’t understand how resources and commodities work
A lot of metal bands do instrumental releases
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLR1qON1IN1zBN4eo7DFL4IYRwZeuKTvWP&si=xY2lo5ha-8070b2P
Thank you, I didn’t check the price and I recalled Xperia as being expensive phones
I still don’t see why I’d pick this over a pixel but to each their own
It’s plastic and it has 21:9 still. Can someone explain to me what the appeal is?
Some scuba divers train to eat bananas underwater. I suspect that wouldn’t be too bad in the shower
The latest update from openai calls this “laziness” and discusses a fix coming
Have you read the post?
If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it