Do you think people shouldn’t be angry or annoyed at things, or call out behaviors and attitudes they things are wrong?

That’s trying to make this seem like a small issue, when it’s not. It’s not about sports. The right has been using “men in women’s sports” as an excuse to try to hurt people.

According to this schmuck there’s nothing wrong with my behavior so I don’t know why I should.

You’re the one claiming I don’t understand you so that’s on you. I got your points, I just disagree with them.

Sure man, have your delusions. I’ll be out here with the real artists while you play pretend. Have fun using a robot to cosplay as someone actually making something.

Sounds like you have issues expressing yourself then

If you’re willing to write it off, then I’d say you’re saying your position is equally dismissed. So cool, it’s great to say we can ignore you and dismiss your edgelord take, something I fully intend to do.

Protection from what? They want this. Trump has been giving them exactly what they want, more money and power.

My comment was meant for a totally different post my bad

Fft, like you’re an expert, you think artists use AI and you can’t draw. Whatever bud go pretend you know what you’re talking about I’m sure it’ll impress someone who’s gullible.

TLDR: So morality doesn’t exist, killing is ok, the way we teach morality to people is too simple, only physical reality matters, and actually there is a morality it’s kind of going along with a good nature balance and it’s sorta nuanced? Gotta feel it in your gut ya know? Anyway I haven’t researched any philosophy or study of ethics.

People posting pictures without crediting or linking to the artist? Who would’ve thought that could happen on my Internet

deleted by creator

Kinda shitty to assume all Americans are responsible. There’s a lot of people here who tried to keep this stuff from happening and fought against it, and still are. If it’s not cool to paint the French with a broad brush it isn’t cool to do that to everyone in the US.

Oh man that’ll be rough, a lot of tech we have is because we have tech from the past. So it’ll be kinda like a Dr Stone situation but without the obnoxious main character.

Ok so, cutting away at the chaff here, your answer was diplomacy.

That’s a have waving, dismissive and ignorant take.

First of all, you’d have to have something you can negotiate with. Something the other side wants that they don’t have. What, exactly, do the American people have that Trump doesn’t have already? He’s already got control over the American people, either through propaganda or force. If you’re thinking that the one card we have is our labor, and also think the military can obliterate us from space, then you might want to look up how the military was used through like, all of labor history through the US. Or South America.

Second, diplomacy and negotiation with whom? The Trump? The guy who’s known for not negotiating? Who goes back on every word? Negotiation comes from people trusting they are going to keep their word and Trump absolutely will not. And do you want a whole new human rights organization to throw on the pile that’s already being ignored, or do you want to utilize a new one?

Third, negotiation has been tried. Democrats “negotiate”, make concessions (which is an inevitable part of negotiating) and we get what? Just a slide to the right each time. You really want to negotiate with fascists?

Fourth, you’d also have to get everyone who’s opposed to Trump and the Republicans to organize, agree to what the terms are, and send representatives. That alone is a Herculean effort. You can’t get along with people on Lemmy, how are you going to get people to agree nationwide? Assuming you don’t get assassinated in the attempt, what negotiating power do you even have of they even would deign to meet with you?

Fifth, the military does have it’s weaknesses. A lot of soldiers do have problems with attacking us citizens in a full on war. Some would even defect. And the us military has a real hard time dealing with guerilla warfare, just look at Vietnam. Especially with supply chain issues because of the tariffs, and if there was a dismantling of the supplies and communications on the home front. So dismissing it out of hand as impossible is jumping the gun I think.

My point is that, while nonviolent revolution is a useful tool, I don’t think it’s the only tool that should be used, and we should keep other options open.

I think a lot of this hinges on what the one million humans are like. You said in another comment you were thinking of them to be mind blanked, but wasn’t sure.

So do these people have their memories? Are they from our earth? Do I get to pick and choose who I can take there? Are they clones or the original?

This can really change what the answer would be and how someone would go about answering your question.

Edit: also what resources are available on new earth? Is it a copy of what we have now, or is it like a blank slate with nothing but nature?

Man, y’all people think we don’t know what “implying” something is or what “reaching a natural conclusion” is. Going “oh well that’s not what I said” isn’t a gotcha. I swear reading comprehension is at an all time low if you think everything has to be said directly.

So ok, I’ll bite, what’s your glorious solution? What should we do oh wise one?

Ok so what, work within the system? The clearly ineffectual system which isn’t working?

Dude, I live within walking distance of like, three galleries, including one I’ve sold at.

You’re kind of an idiot and an ass, so maybe pull your head out sometime, you’ll have fun.