Zoko Argen

Thanks for this! I assumed this would be the case, but you do get rule oddities in magic, especially in weird cases like this. I can’t think of an instance of that either, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there was one somewhere.

Yeah, I like the second one better. Allowing interaction and protection seems like a good idea, and makes the card less of a feels bad.

That being said, I think a more thematic effect would be something along the lines of a “Blood Moon” like effect. “Target lands loses all land types and abilities, and gains the ability '{T}: Add {C}”. Though this offers less interaction and is a massive feel bad for decks that rely on a land for a combo since it would still be in the field just unusable.

It’d have to say “non-token”, since they are the ones creating the token they’d control it (I think you control anything on your battlefield regardless but not 100% on that).

I am unsure how token ownership works… but I don’t think that is good either as that removes the ability of sacrificing a land you’ve stolen.

To be fair, that’s probably expected in Ferengi custom