You may have missed the point of this post. It’s not about enjoying reaction videos. There are lots of creators putting effort into their videos. OP is focused on grifters intentionally forcing a strong reaction to boost engagement on their videos. its annoying that bad videos get pushed by some unknown algorithm.
Zatore
Photographer
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: August 16th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
It’s not news until it’s released. Then we can evaluate
I did share it on my Facebook page which I’ll link below. I’m looking closely at the photos and they are subtly different. I think their photo was taken after some rain as the road looks a bit reflective. Also, the spot I took the photo from seems to be a common spot. I could be wrong so I’ll try and find the original post.
Link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=780881017378078
Edit: here’s Sandy’s post: https://x.com/SandyofSuffolk/status/1787425611717234986
I had to do a double take. The photo of the small English town looks almost exactly like a photo I took when I visited. It’s Castle Combe, pissed me off to no end to find out there is no castle there. Here’s my photo:
518·5 months agoThose lives won’t be on his hands
I partially agree with that. There is a fairly large difference between giving money to the current president vs. the VP. I do think you’re right though that it’s a valid argument that would probably hold up in court. Lets not forget our current supreme court though.
Like most other Trump suits, this one is also for show
I’m pretty sure Legal Eagle covered this (at least partially). There are laws in place that prevent candidates from accessing funds that originally belonged to another candidate. This is a fraud prevention method to make sure that someone doesn’t join a race then drop out purely to dump their funds into a candidate of their choice. A very wealthy person (billionaire?) shouldn’t run for office with the intent of dropping out. There are very strict laws that regulate campaign finance. There are limits on how much money can be donated to a campaign, and money donated to Biden would be ineligible to be given to Harris.
That being said, the money will go towards Harris, but it may go in a roundabout way. The money may be put towards the DNC and their advertising budget which could go to support any DNC candidate. However, since she is the front runner, the money will be spent towards her. Seems like filling suit is just for show, imagine that.
14·10 months ago4D Golf is the most mind-fuck game I’ve ever played! The end of the game threw me for a loop https://store.steampowered.com/app/2147950/4D_Golf/
Nuclear Blaze is a short but action packed. The art style is also amazing! https://store.steampowered.com/app/1662480/Nuclear_Blaze/
That would probably be up to the judge. Theoretically house arrest can be set at any home which could include an out of state address.
He can’t pardon himself in these cases. They are New York state felonies, which means the governor of NY would have to pardon him. If they were federal, then he could maybe pardon himself.
4·1 year agoI spend a lot of time driving, audiobooks are the way to go
1·1 year agoThe glass on the lens doesn’t even resolve that much resolution. I doubt it’s even physically possible to make a piece of glass that perfect. There is a reason people still buy medium format cameras over full frame, the glass elements can be larger and therefore small imperfections are a smaller fraction of the lens. This is also one reason bigger telescopes are always better. Diffraction also kicks in faster with smaller lenses. Even if your glass was perfect, then diffraction of the iris blurs your image.
I don’t believe any of you are real
the like to dislike ratio on that video is wild considering how cringe it is.