So can we back plans on limiting the maximum income of insanely rich people next, such that we make meaningful investments in education, infrastructure, healthcare etc.? Or do we want to keep kicking those already lying on the ground?

Yes. Still you can be philanthropic. Especially if you understand this term in its original meaning, i.e., love for humanity (as an antonym to misanthropy).

You can be philantropic without having any money.

Ditch Google trash. Go for alternatives. E.g., Firefox instead of Chrome.

Apple products are always extremely overpriced. And people still fall for that.

If I may rephrase it: Art can be created by an AI only if it has agency and self-awareness (or, more general, conciousness).

Is that necessary though to create art?

Quite a loaded philosophical question, but an important one if we want to talk about the essence of art and the beings – either natural or artificial – that create it.

Do you think animals, apart from humans, can create art?

By that definition, those without a (known) sense of self-awareness or conciousness, couldn’t. And yet, we can see behaviour that we would call “art”. Be it a bird, which mimicks sounds or invents a dance to impress females, or a fish that draws patterns into the sand for similar reasons.

Korrekt.

And by what definition would an advanced AI be “alive” enough to create art?

“real art”. Gatekeeping art now, are we?

Profit Share missing for Ecosia.

Yes. A quite recent example from Germany:

Letzte Generation (Last Generation) a group of climate activists which glued themselves onto streets, usually carefully planned, organized and communicated with emergency services (such that ambulances can pass). They just got all of the hate and achieved not really much.

Then there were some farmers who were unhappy about governmental advances to reduce or remove the “agricultural diesel” subsidies. They’ve blocked highway entrace ramps with burning car tyres and dung, went really hardcore compared to the Letzte Generation, and finally got what they wanted.

Here is a nice article by the UN environmental programme, which sums up, what those forever pollutants are, how we are exposed to them and why they’re really bad for our health: https://www.unep.org/topics/chemicals-and-pollution-action/pollution-and-health/persistent-organic-pollutants-pops/and

*Upsy /j

Auf auf!

I see, okay. Took it a bit too serious then. ;)

The last line has so many words I do not know.

However, since you distinguish sexual interests from romantic ones in some cases, I wonder where for example “panromantic” or “biromantic” would be on your tier list. Similarly homosexuality is not distniguished from homoromanticism etc…

Nevermind though, in case it wasn’t your intention to create a more or less “complete” picture.

Vielen Dank. Ich habe mein ganzes Leben darauf hingearbeitet. An dieser Stelle möchte ich meiner Grippe danken, die mir die nötige Freizeit verschafft hat an diesem Lebenswerk zu arbeiten. 🥲

Debby-Ahn, Ubuddu oder verwandte Dialekte.

Chemie. Manche sprechen es mit “ch” aus. manche mit “ch”. Ganz andere auch als “ch”. Das ist wie mit China.