It’s correct if in a country where the dishwasher lacks its own water heater.
Dishwashers in the U.S don’t have water heaters and therefore it’s beneficial to purge lukewarm water from the hot water line before starting the dishwasher, such that the water in the dishwasher is on average hotter and as such more effective at washing the dishes.
Dishwashers in Europe have water heaters and as such it’s entirely irrelevant to do it there
That’s what I was thinking about, yeah!
Barbell and rack is what I’d go for with static equipment.
An indoor bike would be another option I’d look for if I wanted some cardio equipment, but in all honesty I just prefer running/cycling outside
Muscles are on a use-it-or-lose-it basis unfortunately
Presumably they wouldn’t want to build the data centers in the national park depicted in the photo, but rather in the larger desert part of Argentinian Patagonia which is basically vast stretches of nothing whatsoever.
It’s maybe the least offensive place to put a data center in for that reason
It’s pretty good practice to have your app modularized to the point where you can execute the core business logic separated from your UI layer, for which you then don’t even need a CLI.
In the same vein, it’s good practice to have your UI be modularized to the point where you can test its logic separated from the core business logic
What’s his motivation for something so deranged?
Sooo what you’re saying is, that there is a substantially high demand for this parking, given how much people are paying for it.
That’s not a warranted conclusion whatsoever.
The building is owned by the luxury warehouse NK that’s located next door. Several floors have in fact just recently been converted from parking space to other more productive uses. A complicating factor is that the building holds cultural heritage status, so NK are not allowed to completely replace it even if they so desired. I’d be willing to bet money that there are very, very few cars that park in the garage, and that NK would be more than happy to re-develop the property should they actually be allowed to do so.
You know how you actually fix this? Get people to stop needing it. Then it will be demolished because there will be no profit in it. Don’t destroy the solution without changing the need.
Again, none of these conclusions actually follow from the facts. Luxury warehouse parking is not a solution for anything when there’s such incredibly high quality transit directly adjacent to the warehouse. The vast majority of the warehouse’s visitors are already sane enough to take transit, or even walk, to get there.
There was recently a push to make an ultra-low emissions zone in central Stockholm, which would include the entrance to this parking garage. It’s currently a matter of dispute - the left wing municipal government is pushing to implement it, and the national right wing government is continuously sabotaging the implementation. There’s only so much sabotage they can continue to do, however, and there’s good reason to believe that the ULEZ will soon be implemented, which will make even fewer cars come in to park in the garage, since they will be banned from driving to the entrance.
Sooooo what do you propose for all the vehicles inside of it?
Anyone parking there has a serious surplus of money - it costs €13/hour to park there.
What they should do is to keep their cars at home and take transit like literally everyone else is doing. Mind you that this is one block from the Stockholm’s central plaza, served by Stockholm Central station, i.e the place that is best served by transit in the entire country.
Rich people vehicle storage is an exceedingly poor land use for such a place.
Parking garages are not cheap, which means there was a significant need for parking spaces.
It was built in the 60s when everyone in the country had highway psychosis. We’ve grown past the illusion that everyone should be taking their car everywhere and get to store it everywhere, especially in dense city environments.
These are a bit fun, but in all honesty this parking garage needs to be torn down and replaced with something actually useful
Chinese models are typically only cheaper than models from western labs, not higher performance. Which is better in one aspect, but not the other
I mean 27b models are practically speaking useless at anything but turning your computer into a space heater, in my experience, but yeah
Yep. In my experience, cyclists just love any bike. They’re all nice!
It’s literally a psyop
What’s this claim based on? The amount of cycles required for the battery to degrade to 80% of capacity is quadrupled when discharging between 80% and 35%. That doesn’t really seem to be compatible with the claim of “1% of the battery life”
person with a 30k€ bike Dx
Unless it was a custom build or something from a luxury automotive brand, that seems unlikely.
Sure, but why create more e-waste? Might as well make the battery you have last.
For the sake of the longevity of your battery, try to never let it go below 35% and never above 80%.
Fundamentally not a serious country
You’ll be surprised to hear that U.S washing machines have the same setup, and this is why they talk about “wash cold” or “wash hot” instead of having specific temperatures on their washing programs like 30 C, 40 C, 60 C etc.