• 0 Posts
  • 510 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 15th, 2023
  • TigrisMorte@kbin.socialtoWorld News@lemmy.world•It’s not just boomers, young people are voting far right too
    3·
    11 months ago

    Lots more elections than every four! Every Election, no excuses!

    Bellow I’ve filtered out the primaries, which often have issues not related to party as well, and excludes local elections.

    link at end:
    “2023 – November (Constitutional)
    Registered Voters
    17,759,273
    Voting Age Population (VAP)
    21,925,627
    Percentage of VAP Registered
    81.00%
    Turnout
    2,563,469
    Percent of Turnout to Registered
    14.43%
    Percent of Turnout to VAP
    11.69%
    2022 – November (Gubernatorial)
    Registered Voters
    17,672,143
    Voting Age Population (VAP)
    21,866,700
    Percentage of VAP Registered
    80.82%
    Turnout
    8,102,908
    Percent of Turnout to Registered
    45.85%
    Percent of Turnout to VAP
    37.06%
    2021 - November (Constitutional)
    Registered Voters
    16,968,756
    Voting Age Population (VAP)
    21,866,700
    Percentage of VAP Registered
    77.60%
    Turnout
    1,485,066
    Percent of Turnout to Registered
    8.75%
    Percent of Turnout to VAP
    6.79%
    2020 – November (Presidential)
    Registered Voters
    16,955,519
    Voting Age Population (VAP)
    21,596,071
    Percentage of VAP Registered
    78.51%
    Turnout
    11,315,056
    Percent of Turnout to Registered
    66.73%
    Percent of Turnout to VAP
    52.39” - https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/historical/70-92.shtml

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.world•A bit late
    12·
    1 year ago

    The post was in response to someone asking, “Do you have those stats?”
    My post referenced probability multiple times.
    That is the last of the clues I’m going to give. Perhaps try reading it again and looking up the words you are unsure of. Then instead of attempting to derail by arguing your imaginary discussion, consider that what was posted is exactly what was meant, no more, no less. You’ll eventually figure it out.
    Nothing is off limits. I simply refuse to play your game of pretending I said something you wish to be angry about.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.world•A bit late
    32·
    1 year ago

    I’d happily discussed what I posted. I have no interest in discussing your imaginary post which you chose to address rather than my post. I also have no interest in discussing anything with someone that wishes to pretend I posted anything other than I did.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.world•A bit late
    51·
    1 year ago

    Please show where I stated anything of the desires of the bear. I’m hinging nothing on proximity. You are simply assuming things I did not state. I covered that it wasn’t a risk assessment. Only thing bogged down is so bogged with your assumptions.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.world•A bit late
    2411·
    1 year ago

    Very few people someone gets near enough to be grabbed by want to rape them. Nearly every bear someone gets near enough to be grabbed by wants to kill them. A large number of women feel it is better to be killed by a bear than live with their irrational fear that every man they get near shall rape them. The fear not being rational is irrelevant as the fear is based upon a more than likely chance, approx. 25% is reported, that at some point the fear was justified and not irrational. However those numbers are screwy as folks that get raped are more likely to get raped again.

    I’d give percentage chances of each occurring, (the National Park Service estimates the odds of being attacked by a bear are about one in 2.1 million​.), but the media seems to only report percentage of gender raped not chance of rape.