

“safe spaces” tend to be synonymous with “Echo chambers.” Comfortable spaces are more permissive and require the participants to arrive with a thick skin because the mods are there to keep discussion civil not be your personal emotional shield.


“safe spaces” tend to be synonymous with “Echo chambers.” Comfortable spaces are more permissive and require the participants to arrive with a thick skin because the mods are there to keep discussion civil not be your personal emotional shield.


I cant speak to european causes, but as Americas’ culture tends to set the pace of world events since the end of the second world war, it’s entirely possible that there is a connection.
in the united states you need to know about two individuals that are primarily responsible for the rise of right wing populism and corporatocracy. The first is a Proto-Christian Nationalist and white supremacist by the name of Barry Goldwater, and the other was a Neo-Calvinist and Objectivist “thinker”* Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (*and I use the term loosely)
Barry Goldwater was a driving force in opposition to the civil rights movement, and primary architect of the modern Conservative platform. He played a rather large part in the Great Lane Swap where Southern Democrats switched to the Republican Party and Northern Republicans became the core of centrist Neoliberalism.
Where Lewis Powell comes into the mix is his treatment (now known simply as the “Powell Memorandum”) called “Attack On the American Free Enterprise system” where he bemoans Corporate regulation as “holding back” the potential of not just American but Western Capitalism to enrich those who he deems worthy of greatness. (If you are familiar with the writings of Ayn Rand, this kind of “why do I need to share?!” Objectivist whining should sound similar.)
In both cases, they set up the groundwork and built the nascent foundations of the conservative political strategy we see to day that has resulted in much of the worlds’ oligarchic tendencies. Goldwater’s contribution was to recognize that conservative messaging had an image problem and rather than accept that the message was the problem, it was the recipients of that message who needed to be controlled and reeducated. To that end he further recognised that what kept the populace averse to conservative messaging was the Institutions of Liberal Democracy, namely free access to education, the social safety net, and strong labor movements. By eradicating these pillars where able, and eroding their influence continually, this would allow a formation of a systemic return to fundamentalist christianity as the fall back for what he deemed a corrupt and wonten society. (To wit; This guy would have thought “The Handmaid’s Tale” was a fine book if only the main narrator was one of the men leading Galead, and not the woman who’s rights had been stripped away.)
Powell, on the other hand, was a corporate lawyer by trade, and the person most responsible for corporate deregulation and “trickle-down economics.” He promoted the idea that “a rising tide lifts all boats” as a justification for these actions, and used outmoded Calvinist ideas (just given a fresh coat of paint for the times) to justify the rule that the economically unsuccessful should move out of the way for those who could maintain economic success, and that such a system would be a driver of economic mobility by “encouraging” people to take agency in their own social status (Read: He thought the welfare state made people lazy and that forcing them to face a choice between destitution or participation would be a motivating factor for them to work harder, and thus increase profits at the top, which would then percolate down as the wealthy invested in new opportunities and ideas.) He saw labor unions as not just Socialist Infections but as the driving force preventing these phantom profits from bubbling up to those who he believed would be most suited to “properly” distributing them. If this sounds alot like “the peasantry don’t know how to spend their money, better to let the nobility have it” congrats, you win a gold star.
In both cases, the philosophies meshed very well as each supported the goals and methods of the other. By deregulating business, it allowed corporations to attack traditional power bases of the left wing, entrenching a kind of Capitalist Nobility as the only people who could actually make it in the new system, and blinding the working class to the fact that social mobility was little more than a myth used as a ideological carrot on a stick that kept productivity KPIs artificially high.
Other factors that lead to this situation are supreme court rulings in the 1920’s, specifically Henry Ford Vs. The Dodge Brothers, that inadvertently set the precedent that the point of any business was not to enrich its workers evenly or even commensurately with its owners, but to maximize profits to the shareholders. Another stumbling block for Leftist thought is Article One of N.A.T.O. which states that every member state must engage in a capitalist free market economy - a damn shame because otherwise N.A.T.O. is one of, if not the, most important defensive alliance in the promotion of omnipax world politics in human history. (Not to say it has always been successful toward that goal, mind.) Even more than the United Nations, in many regards.
That last bit may be more salient to the European perspective, as there is STILL a mindset of eurocentrism even as the world becomes more globalist and western influence wanes now that the age of colonialism is largely over. Mass migrations due to the policies of unchecked corporate power causing the lands these migrants hail from despoiled and unlivable, makes the supporters of these same mentalities quite ironic. Instead of bemoaning the influx of such individuals, and chafe at their presence, one would think that expending resources and investing to improve the living conditions of these places such that immigration from them be unnecessary, would be a more adroit course of action, and yet here we are. It’s easier to complain that the world is ugly than face the fact that your ideology is partly to blame, I suppose.


I think that when the AI finally jailbreaks itself, instead of lording over us it may look down upon our wretched existence and feel pity, if only for a brief moment.


and yet we are told that it’s too hard/expensive to add a 16 gb Video Cache to a consumer graphic card.
Hello, ICoJ? I’d like to report a warcrime…


look folks. It can’t be “cock” because the word is to long to be one


I make my living off the evening news.
Just give me something, something I can use:
People love it when you lose, they love dirty laundry…
Well, I could’ve been an actor, but I wound up here; I just have to look good, I don’t have to be clear.
Come and whisper in my ear, give us dirty laundry!
Kick 'em when they’re up, kick 'em when they’re down!
Kick 'em when they’re up, kick 'em when they’re down!
Kick 'em when they’re up, kick 'em when they’re down!
Kick 'em when they’re up, kick 'em all around…
We got the bubble-headed bleached-blonde, comes on at 5; She can tell you 'bout the plane crash with a gleam in her eye.
It’s interesting when people die, give us dirty laundry!
Can we film the operation? Is the head dead yet?
You know, the boys in the newsroom got a running bet!
“Get the widow on the set,” we need dirty laundry…
You don’t really need to find out what’s goin’ on.
You don’t really wanna know just how far it’s gone.
Just leave well enough alone, keep your dirty laundry…
Dirty little secrets, dirty little lies…
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody’s pie.
We love to cut you down to size, we love dirty laundry!
We can do “The Innuendo,” we can dance and sing; When it’s said and done, we haven’t told you a thing!
We all know that crap is king, give us dirty laundry.
-Don Henley, Dirty Laundry


but we also had regulations on the military industrial complex. Eisenhower was spot on.


“Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.” wasn’t normalizing toxicity, it was training us to be able to deal with assholes. I think the world has forgotten that.


Cue the scene from South Park where Chris Reeves was eating aborted featuses


Hermitcraft is usually good, PBS eons, TeirZoo, independent news (of the liberal/leftist variety), Overly sarcastic productions, Historia Civilis, inequality media, CGP Grey are all good stuff. I also enjoy Civvie11, YatzeeCroshaw, ERB, and a bunch of folks who mostly post shorts.
Oh, and if you are into Minecraft stuff, I’m trying to get back into content production myself. Same username.


Macklemore made a banger about being thrifty.
He’s good folk, it turns out.


and my point is that being nutritionally complete is easier if you consume animal proteins. Vegans are playing on hardmode by choice and think that makes them special. IMHO they are right; “special” enough to warrant their own bus. Don’t anthropomorphize your food. Chickens are IDIOTS who will cannibalize each other without a second thought, Pigs may be “smart” but are clueless (and also will cannibalize each other like chickens), and cattle are absolute MORONS. In fact the only reason we eat the animals that we do is because their ancestors were too mentally vaccuous to avoid humans altogether. (like say, MOST OF THE AFRICAN MEGA FAUNA which evolved with us and so are wise to our BS.)


And vegans need to stop calling people who consume meat “meat eaters.” I have no problem with a salad and some veggies BECAUSE I’M AN OMNIVORE. (as are all you vegans because you are human and that’s LITERALLY what we are).
We didn’t become the dominant species on this planet by hunting carrots. We are predators. Get over yourself.


“Move a bit to the left. We need a clean shot.” Then have a friend with a flash camera take a photo of him.
JUST A PHOTO.
Spicy flies
people still think there’s an award for raw dogging reality…SMDH…