

6·
22 hours agoNah, no one would choose to be in debt.
Bro chose to get an education. Big difference.
Nah, no one would choose to be in debt.
Bro chose to get an education. Big difference.
🌏👨🚀🔫👨🚀🌌 always have bean
Well, it’s impossible for anyone who owns a red sports car to become homeless, so he must have been lying.
Nah plenty of people use them dawg. Maybe you just haven’t been exposed to it.
No autocorrect? Pfft, filthy casuals. I haven’t even stricken a line through a word since the Carter administration.
Yep. It’s quite literally an expression of power for them. Pointing it out does nothing but feed them.
So when a tradesman’s back finally gives out and he gets fired for not showing up to work, he should not be eligible for unemployment, medicaid, medicare, food stamps, housing assistance, subsidized health insurance, or any other publicly funded assistance. That’s his problem to solve.
After all, the data has always shown that this is the sacrifice you make by not going to college. Degrees have always been economically worth it in the long run, and that information was always readily available, so why is it everyone else’s problem and cross to bear when one more plumber decides he actually can’t do this job until he’s in his mid sixties? We should just let people die for making poor choices.
OR
We live in a society that requires a variety of skill sets and knowledge bases, including the trades, retail, food service, the sciences, the humanities, medicine, and plenty of other fields that require postsecondary study. We should remove all financial barriers to education, and we should eliminate student debt, because it serves no purpose other than lining the pockets of large financial institutions. And generally speaking, you know, we should take care of glaring issues we see in our society, like a plumber who can’t work for medical reasons or a Ph.D who can’t effectively contribute to society because he’s crushed by student debt. And we should do all of those things with public assistance programs.
Also, “should have read the fine print” is a dead giveaway for being on the unethical side of an argument.