And apathy is why so many businesses are getting away with anti consumer practices.
And apathy is why so many businesses are getting away with anti consumer practices.
I think you’re missing the point that it is working and they are intentionally breaking it.
Personal spite, hell try personal gain. Don’t forget this asshole is running for president. Should hit him with election tampering.
Most MMA fighters would be better politicians than those bozos
Mullin was a MMA fighter. I wouldn’t dare to say he makes a good politician. We have enough reality TV bullshit in DC already.
No idea why your being down voted. This is 100% correct.
“Even the most hardcore republican can see that he is a con artist.”
Come now, that’s giving them way too much credit.
Yes of course and I’m posting on that article to question the claims it’s making. OP stated that the implication was not that the family was targeted but if you read the article it very clearly is. I want to know if there are any supporting facts because it seems unlikely to me.
You said “most people here read it as fact that Israel tarteted his family” I’m saying well yeah the article stated it as fact that they targeted his family I just want to know if that is likely or not because to me it seems far fetched.
The article very clearly accused Israel of targeting his family.
Did you even open the article? Just read the first paragraph.
Today, Al-Jazeera Bureau Chief Wael El-Dahdouh was reporting live in Gaza when an Israeli airstrike killed his wife and two children. Now, other journalists also fear their families could be targeted solely for them doing their job.
Serious question: What are the chances that the family is being targeted versus just being in a building they happened to bomb along with so many others? The article doesn’t address that, and it’s hard for me to believe that Israel would even know where this guy’s family was. I would think if their intelligence was that good, then they should be able to locate some of the hostages, right? Just for context, I think both sides suck and don’t care to hear any vitriol from either side. I’m really only interested in discussing if there is any evidence this was a targeted attack vs happenstance.
You still don’t get it. Unfortunately most voters think like you and that’s why we are stuck.
Nope, this isn’t true. If a candidate can get at least 5% of the popular vote for the presidency, they will secure federal funding for their party in the next election cycle. Access to the debates, visibility, and legitimacy—factors that could make people who think like you consider it as a viable option—are all key aspects of how a party gets started. If everyone who didn’t vote instead voted third party, well, the third party would probably win. However, ‘everyone’ is a big stretch, so let’s consider people who want to vote but dislike the two major choices. They can get the ball rolling towards becoming an actual option.
So many American voters believe that if they vote for someone who doesn’t win then they wasted their vote. I really don’t get it. Wasting your vote is voting for a candidate you do not support.
Why get legal experts to weight in on this? That assumes he is listening to his counsel which we all know he is not. Need a phycologist to weight in on this instead to make any sense of it. I don’t think his delusional narcissistic ass has the capacity to realize he is going to lose, but I’m not a legal expert or psychologist.
Can I just volunteer to live in the state primarily populated by cows? That sounds wonderful. Cows make better neighbors then most people. Maybe I can vote a cow in as our state representative.
I say we go further and just get rid of Florida all together.
I feel like we should all make accounts on true social to triple dog dare him to ignore the lawyers, and do the press conference. I’ll pop the popcorn.
Nothing blows my mind more then someone deciding that today theyre going to crawl out of bed and go counter protest people wanting equal rights.