You have to know the rules, why they exist, and what breaking them implies.
If you are in a class designed to teach the rules, it doesn’t even matter if you already did all 3 steps. You’ll fail the class because the class is testing if you CAN follow the rules.
It depends on your definition of AI, and ‘cure’, and to what degree you credit the AI with a human operator.
If you mean in the truest sense, “An artificial intelligence autonomously discovered & validated a cure”, then none. Because artificial intelligence does not exist. If you mean “A language calculator (llms) autonomously discovered and validated a cure”, then also none. If you mean the weaker version of “An LLM supported research leading to cures”, then lots. But did the humans do that? If I build a house with a hammer, did the hammer build the house? If you mean the even weaker version of “Data modeling coalesced data which discovered patterns at a scale humans never could on their own which lead to cures”, then nearly every cure in the last 30 years.
It’s one of those things that gets more complicated the closer you look.
Sure. But that’s not realistically on the table.
You should stop viewing the US government as being on your side. They are the HR of our society. “AI legislation” in all it’s current proposed forms are just mechanisms to exclude things like open-weight models or foreign competitors from entering the market. So long as AI exists as an element of our society it will cause harms. Advocate for it’s abolition, not regulation.
The two being conflated c o n s t a n t l y pisses me off
Do you not understand that the maximum allowed penalty does not signal it is the standard or common penalty? Did you read the article?
Please stop responding with your bullshit 🫰
Ah well I misunderstood. Congrats on the titties
Pretty much all of these examples included additional crimes such as rape, multiple murders, etc. which was my point
The two that don’t were later overturned.
Did you read the article? Maybe spend more time doing research than writing a comment… Or better yet at least read the comment you are responding to first.
I will soften my position from “ever” because that includes some of the archaic shit the US did in prior centuries. A better articulation is that they have done any recently
Aren’t the linked pictures meant to show titty milk
The practice of fear mongering to create public pressure for increased legislation, as a mechanism to suppress competition, is a well know mechanism called “regulatory capture”.
If you oppose monopolies then you oppose this practice and should view posts like this as morally wrong.
Even birthing mothers often cannot produce milk within hours of birth. Many produce colostrum but it often takes many hours/days for even that to come in.
I’ve never heard of that story but it definitely was not necessary beyond the skin-to-skin benefits.
“Nature getting confused and doing weird shit” is about as natural as it gets.
@OP Am I misunderstanding? Aren’t the linked pics meant to show MtF mammary expression? I’m not seeing any.
Happy to be told I’m just blind w/ a red circle
I get it’s fun to taunt Trump but booooooo for shaming platonic compliments.
Immediately? No
Often? Via additional details like them being drawn sexually? Yes
There was recently a mother that killed her 3 kids, admitted to it, and was likely going to a mental institute where she would have been able to be released within months. It’s not that uncommon to hear about a college girl that kills her baby shortly after birth as a way to try to escape the reality.
I’m not that informed on the subject but I would be very surprised if death penalty was ever given for a single instance of killing a baby. Death penalty isn’t even legal in many states although that’s a separate controversial issue.
Morally wrong AND sexually unappealing*, I can’t imagine why it doesn’t exist
I have absolutely 100% seen the “she’s a 1000 year old witch coincidentally drawn as a child” unironically in many nsfw forums. Like it’s not hard to find, there is evidence of it on Reddit even let alone sites dedicated to the subject or with worse moderation policies.
It’s out there. Denying it’s existence just reveals your own ignorance on the subject.
The death penalty isn’t even commonly applied to one-off first degree murder convictions. It normally takes some other factor such as torture or multiple killings to escalate it to death penalty.
Even if you think abortion is murder this is detached from reality.
Twitter users when you say you hate the Democrats.
“Welcome klansmen!”
99.99% of all MF’s that say some shit like “Yeah I got bad grades, but if they tested critical thinking then I would have cum loud or whatever”
Yeah ok brother. You couldn’t critically think your way through a 3 page structured essay but I’m sure you were just holding back.