- 3 Posts
- 5 Comments
My point was, that my bank is way more lenient compared to Wero and there is no good reasoning for Wero to be so paranoid. Wero does not actually offer a webapp.
I’m not that well versed myself, but a normal SEPA tranfer via IBAN is SCT, right? And the instant SEPA transfer “Echtzeitüberweisung” is what banks offer internally for their clients, being SCT Inst. So Wero then just allows you to build SCT Inst requests on the fly and send them off? That has me a bit confused as to why it’s marketed as a destinct platform/product. If this is the case, shouldn’t it just basically be a vcard/qr-string type format you can generate locally like a template, share with a “buyer” and they send it to their bank. Like how “Girocode” is already used. There is no real need for an account, is there?
Nicro@discuss.tchncs.deto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Is DeleteMe.org real? Looks too good to not be a data stealing scam.
13·10 months agoIn reality they do help superficially, but they very much inflate their numbers on a shiny dashboard, showing you how much they’re helping. All while only hitting a small fraction of databrokers.
I also think, that as a subscription solution to a problem, they could turn into the online version of turbotax any second now. Lobbying for harder self-optouts so that their service stays relevant.
Not to sound stupid, but it really depends on how smart you want the watch to be. From connectionless firmware device to fully-featured Android. +1 for gadget bridge either way.
I have a Fossil Hybrid, that combines physical hands with a 2-color e-ink display. It can’t do apps, but it has standalone timers, notifications, media control, pulse/oxygen and step counter. I personally don’t need more. It’s cloudless and lasts a week.
If you need full Android/WearOS check AsteroidOS and specific ROMs. Hardware tends to be on the older side here.
The only thing that’s hard to do is sleep tracking. That tends to rely on proprietary algorithms and cloud compute a lot.

App verification is only enforced on ROMs that honor it. You can choose to patch it out of the OS as the maintainer. Which will bar you from being a google certified OS.
The people behind GOS have gone on record, stating that they don’t care about being google certified, and GOS will not enforce dev verification. So this changes nothing for GOS.
To stop GOS, google would need to change their bootloader policy. I haven’t heard of any indicators for this though.
In summary, you’re fine to use it on new and used Pixels. Given current information.
Reference: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/26337-android-developer-verification-are-we-screwed