• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 20th, 2024

help-circle



  • Honestly, this is not really technobabble. If you imagine a user with a poor grasp of namespaces following a few different poorly written guides, then this question seems plausible and makes sense.

    The situation would be something like this: the user wants to look at the container’s “root” filesystem (maybe they even want to change files in the container by mounting the image and navigating there with a file manager, not realizing that this won’t work). So they follow a guide to mount a container image into the current namespace, and successfully mount the image.

    For the file explorer, they use pcmanfm, and for some reason decided to install it through Flatpak - maybe they use an immutable distro (containers on Steam Deck?). They gave it full filesystem access (with user privileges, of course), because that makes sense for a file explorer. But they started it before mounting the container image, so it won’t see new mounts created after it was started.

    So now they have the container image mounted, have successfully navigated to the directory into which they mounted it, and pcmanfm shows an empty folder. Add a slight confusion about the purpose of xdg-open (it does sound like something that opens files, right?), and you get the question you made up.







  • Nah, the kernel isn’t that important for apps - you can replace the kernel and update the massive Android framework to work with the new one relatively easily (you will need some Linux compatibility for native code that does syscalls on its own, but that’s pretty much it - even WSL1 could do that).

    It’s all the APIs and system apps provided by Google that have no reasonable alternative in AOSP that are the problem for compatibility. Look how incomplete projects like MicroG (an open-source implementation of Google Play Services) are, and their only goal is to provide Android compatibility for unofficial ROMs without installing the proper Google services.






  • That indeed is a Bluetooth feature that supposedly makes audio quality better by only lowering the volume using the actual speaker driver instead of doing it digitally and potentially throwing away some quiet sounds. In theory, doing it this way is always better and should be preferred. In practice, many devices handle it terribly.

    If you want to turn the feature off, you can enable developer options on your phone (settings -> About phone -> tap Build number a bunch of times) and turn off absolute volume. That will give you back software volume control with fine-grained adjustments.





  • Indeed, try switching your smartphone to airplane mode and see how far your voice commands get you.

    Did that (or rather disabled mobile data and WiFi, because airplane mode would still keep the WiFi on), and then I dictated this sentence after the parentheses. So Google’s voice input works offline just fine.

    Or do they mean something like a smart assistant? In that case fair, but it’s not like it will work with text input either.

    It is true, however, that Google Translate doesn’t do offline voice translation even if the language you’re trying to translate from is downloaded for system-wide voice recognition.