I’m sure the actual paper defines this better, but without a definition of what puts something in this category, it’s not useful.

Even for bread, is it all bread? Is it added gluten? Is it a specific preservative? Is it only bread with bleached flour?

Even so, mass produced and packaged is not the actual contributor…

Same with prepared food… Costco makes prepared food that is equivalent to what you’d make at home. It’s that still bad? If not, what other prepared food is fine?

Surprise, it’s religious history.

This question should be illegal. Name changes should be simple and up to the individual when they have autonomy. Before then, you get whatever your parents want, because names are just made up nonsense anyway.

Just mandate a luxury tax on all things normal people don’t buy. You can have wealth, but you cannot have anything normal people cannot have without paying. Oh you want to acquire a whole ass business? You want to donate millions for political influence? You want a Ferrari? Want more land or a huge house? You pay demoralizing amounts of luxury tax.

So you don’t really want to archive in the technical sense, you want it offline for security, which is valid but extremely inconvenient for regular end users.

Warranty… Some are 15-20 years, but you need proof of purchase docs, which are often emailed data.

It’s likely easier for people to learn to love trans people than understand there are no fish… If that tells you anything.

Fact checks for validity are not necessarily slanted, and one could argue the validity of a claim is the core of investigative journalism. Just repeating verbatim what someone said is arguably not journalism at all.

This is just not correct. Sweat and folds and proximity to other parts, probably double wrapped all day in plastic clothing… Not washing your arms and not washing your balls for a day has very different results.

It would be, if it were comprehensive and applicable to match making, but I don’t think for most people that can be gleaned from fedi. Most people only lurk, few even directly follow communities, and the content people do interact with likely does not represent them well unless they put themselves out there like that.

Just like match and okc you’d have to take a quiz and match against core values. Social media data mining would be a terrible way of matching.

Simple sorts are fundamentally different than the algorithms people are talking about.

Aside from some over the counter numbing creams and surgery there is nothing to be done by a doctor anyway. At best you can massage it gently in a shower or bath. You didn’t say how long you’ve had it, but it takes weeks to reduce. Just tell them if you feel you must, there is no magic way to say embarrassing things except for practice doing so.

I think most in this thread are missing the point. It’s not really about specific knowledge, it’s about day to day existence and entertainment. The average person isn’t deep diving any topic, but nevertheless seeking the next dopamine hit becomes harder and harder and you’ve seen every core day to day thing by like age 20 which you must then rehash for another 60 years. I get the sentiment.

What? What I said meant they do want this. I don’t think those voters care or are trying to take it back. Hence news any significant amount is feeling that way feels dubious.

And you assume this story is true too… It’s not.

Journalism should be, but does not currently. Newspapers usually, as in decades ago, but do not currently.

Nothing

Preventing some, some of the time, is how you get here, inch by inch, and eventually earlier wins become future losses.

I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.