

If only it wasn’t so trivial for her to trick people into giving her attention and publicity.
If only it wasn’t so trivial for her to trick people into giving her attention and publicity.
Oh, I didn’t see that a non JS version is in the works. I just assumed it redirected to the regular page, because the block page practically looks the same. Thank you for correcting me.
You don’t offer old., AND you force people through javascript with the intent to post to meta of all places. I understand I am not the target audience even without looking at the post, but I hope it’s clear to you how suspicious and ironic that combination of factors looks.
Finde ich gar nicht absurd. Als ich deinen Kommentar gelesen habe, hatte ich sofort das Bild von Juergen Ferkulat im Kopf.
ed: link repariert
While I appreciate your cyberpunky laser neon fog enthusiasm, I’d really like to know how to actually fix this. After reading the Article, I think that simply painting a pattern with enough contrast and a way to enhance distance estimation would be good. Most of the ones I know are white with some small black elements at the tips, which is almost the worst I can imagine. I’d guess they simply can’t estimate the distance, even if they see that the things are there. They don’t have bad eyes, but the things are gigantic white planes with some light shading from the shape, but that probably just looks like a fuck off huge white-grey plane in terms of depth perception. Painting some marks on it to allow the parallax to make it obvious how big the distance between background and foreground is sounds like a super simple solution that might solve most of the problems. Then there’s also the possibility that they ram themselves into the blades deliberately, because humans made their whole habitat a nightmare…
Heilige Scheisze o_O! Ist aber, falls das auch ernst gemeint war, Kim Il-Sung.
Really? “Oh pleeeease, you dunce, I know it’s difficult for people like you to understand, but powerful people are powerful”.
You are defending engagement with what equates to a soap opera for politics. You are actively defending people memeing about what some politician said - in this case even about something that is completely irrelevant to anyone but deluded religionists - which is just a lot of lies in every instance anyway.
Why don’t you promote engagement with shit they DO instead?
Are you deliberately fueling this pointless meme bullshit about political theater to make people feel better about themselves, in order to prevent them from doing something about the actually bad things that are going on outside of their doors right fucking now?
Or was that just some masturbatory eruption to satisfy your condescending impulse to snortleingly correct the defective thinking of some mentally inferior fool on the internet?
Why is my reply so heated? I see two possibilities:
And I give you the intellectual benefit of the doubt and say you are doing it deliberately.
People like you have been distracting the public discussion like this for as long as I live, and you try to make people criticizing the distraction look stupid, while elevating yourself.
“Pleeeeeeeease don’t be a dummy, my dearest friend and buddy, pleeeeeease!”. FUCK that.
We see preparations for concentration camps, actual genocides, the implementation of total surveillance states, the enactment of police state enablement laws, dismantling of human rights of every level, a burning planet, techno-oligarchs, so called “centrists” buddying up with fascists, territorial-/resource wars… and you defend people talking about SOME CUNT TALKING ABOUT SOME DEAD ASSHOLE WITH A TALL HAT? IN A POLITICS SECTION!
What the fuck!
If you say “Hey buddy, don’t harsh on our stupid time, let us only talk about dumb stuff this year”, I might just think “sigh Ok…” and dejectedly walk away, having my lack of faith in humanity validated once again, but your way of defending it is actually revolting to me.