2·
2 days agoIf there really is a systemic effort to oppress Uyghurs based on ethnicity then its not happening on xiaohongshu.
What an absurdly weird statement.
- 279 Posts
- 190 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: January 29th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Here is another tiny sample of a few dozens ‘non-RFA’ sources:
https://xinjiang.sppga.ubc.ca/teaching/documentaries
As you appear to like watching videos: https://www.arte.tv/en/videos/087898-000-A/arte-reportage
Maybe you can manage to watch these two:
I read them.
If you want to get a broader summary of the situation, the Campaign for Uyghurs’ website may be helpful. Canada’s House of Commons provides also good insights as well as the International Bar Association and Holocaust Memorial Museum in the US.
“Break Their Lineage, Break Their Roots”, is a report by Human Right Watch from 2021, detailing China’s crimes against humanity targeting Uyghurs and other Turkic muslims.
It comes from all over. You’ll easily find much more.
[Edit typo.]
Nah, the Chinese propaganda is elsewhere. The articles provided at https://sopuli.xyz/c/China are the result of sophisticated, independent, and reliable investigations.
Can you provide any evidence for your claim? It’s clearly wrong, as there has been strong evidence for the suppression of Uyghurs, Tibetans, and other minorities by the Chinese government for a very long time, from many independent sources.
Your statement is outright false.
There is much evidence of genocide by the Chinese Communist Party in Xinjiang (as well as Tibet and with other minorities in China). You are parroting CCP propaganda.
“One of the scenarios is… to give up territory. It’s not fair. But for the peace, temporary peace, maybe it can be a solution, temporary,” he said […]
[…] his country may have to give up territory, albeit temporarily.
What does this mean? How do you give up territory “temporarily,” especially as “the 53-year-old […] stressed that the Ukrainian people would ‘never accept occupation’ by Russia”?
Mr. Klitschko should rather listen to Svitlana, the teacher cited at the end of the article: “Those who think that Putin will stop if he is given Crimea, they don’t know who the Russians are, he is not going to stop.”
I wrote this in another thread, but it fits also here: It’s good that they don’t buy, but Spain just signed a contract with China’s Huawei to provide digital storage systems for its law enforcement and intelligence agency provide digital storage systems for its law enforcement and intelligence. So I feel it’s a Spanish hypocrisy here.
The argument of slave labour in China is one manufactured in Washington. There are bad working conditions in various places and there’s corrective labour, but no slavery.
Your statements are wrong, they even replicate China’s state propaganda. There has been strong evidence for slave labour and repression of Uyghurs and other minorities now for a long time.
Europe had a thriving solar industry in the 2000s, and we must revive that.
So Spain didn’t sign a contract with China’s Huawei as reported in local media? (To answer the question: Yes, of course they did.)
I get what you mean. On the other hand, dependence on a server infrastructure is much worse imho.
Andrzej Duda is a pro-Russia, pro-China politician and former presidential candidate of the Polish PiS, a far-right politcial party. It’s not too surprising that this interview has been conducted by Euronews, owned by people close to Hungarian PM Viktor Orban, who is a pro-Russia, pro-China politician of Hungarian Fidesz, a far-right political party. This is nothing but a propaganda piece.
[Edit typo.]
It’s good that they don’t buy from Israel, though at the same time Spain uses China’s Huawei for its intelligence and police systems. Isn’t that a bit inconsistent?
especially while China is actually offering to work with us and to help us out in dealing with our biggest immediate threat.
I don’t think that China wants to work with anyone to ‘help’ them. They just try to take advantage of the situation, but the Chinese government hasn’t become better because the U.S. got worse.
This is for training teens and kindergartners for war.
As Moscow prepares for possible negotiations with Washington aimed at ending its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, it is seeking a far more ambitious outcome than a mere ceasefire: a global reordering of spheres of influence.
In the Kremlin’s view, such an agreement would effectively mean U.S. recognition of Russian dominance in the post-Soviet space — including Ukraine — and, to some extent, an acknowledgment of its influence in Europe.
To secure that goal, the Kremlin is now scouring for incentives it believes can catch and hold President Donald Trump’s attention, ranging from rare earths deals and geopolitical leverage in Iran and North Korea to a long-dreamed-of Trump Tower in Moscow.
Five current Russian government officials, including two diplomats, three sources close to the Kremlin and employees of three major state-owned companies confirmed this to The Moscow Times, all speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
“The main thing is that they [the Americans] don’t interfere in our affairs and don’t tell us how to live,” said a senior Russian official familiar with the Kremlin’s negotiating logic. “That they don’t hinder us in doing what we are doing.”
What an absurdly derailed comment in this context.
Yes, China must stop spying on dissidents (exiled and non-exiled, of course) and stop supressing minorities in the country.
Quick remainder that the reason for China’s sanctions were critical reports by MEPs on the Chinese Communist Party’s genocidal policy particularly in the Xinjiang region. As this is ongoing and hasn’t changed, there is no reason for the EU to lift its sanctions against China.
Currently, the Chinese individuals and organisations still blacklisted by the EU are: