I second this. I’ve played it with three mates now and they all loved it

It has been 0 days since I last recommended freetube as a youtube frontend without their bullshit

!aneurysmposting@sopuli.xyz

Make a big “uh oh” hole

Implied she also did it with Walter Jr.

I’ve installed Linux mint about a month ago and it’s been great. The only real problem that stops me from moving everything over is:

I can’t properly play small untranslated Japanese games that aren’t on steam

To be clear, I can run them just fine, it’s just that the translator I used (VN Translator Neo) can’t be run on Linux. When I run it using wine, the window just goes black

I’ve tried a few other image-based translators, but they all either don’t run or don’t detect the game in wine

If anybody has a workaround (besides dual booting windows) I’d be very grateful

Me, trying to figure out how trying to stop people taking a highly addictive drug that meets none of our needs is control over our body:

I agree they’re partially at fault, but to deny the part the company played by creating artificial FOMO, sales, and gates is barbaric to say the least

It needs more regulation, I agree. Particularly for premium currencies (which thankfully the EU seems to be doing something about)

I had an argument with a guy who was in a shared friend’s discord server about this. He was adamant that, if somebody spent too much money on a game, then it was all their fault. Despite me going over several (clearly manipulative) tactics, all he said was that people who fell for these must be stupid and that they deserved it

Yeah later on he was kicked because of other (Similarly dickish) reasons

You need to be caught with enough that you cannot feasibly use yourself. Having two or three vapes is not enough to be prosecuted. The fact that the individual sells needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt

This is a blanket statement that doesn’t really mean anything

1. It is highly unlikely one study would do this (purposefully put their patients in danger)

2. It is even more unlikely that this study would continue without being retracted

3. It is unfathomably unlikely that all other studies on the matter would do the same thing and agree on the results

I guess the biggest problem here is that I never mentioned a specific study, and neither did you.

If you want a good report on the matter, check out: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Eaton DL, Kwan LY, Stratton K, editors. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018 Jan 23. 5, Toxicology of E-Cigarette Constituents. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507184/

An interesting exert from it is the following:

Compounds not listed on labels also have been identified in e-liquids. Several hazardous compounds have been found in liquids and in the heated aerosol produced by e-cigarettes, including formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein, which are known carcinogenic toxicants.

Edit: ah yes, the classic “I can’t think of any way to rebuke what they said so I’m just going to downvote them because I can’t add anything meaningful to the discussion, but I’m still convinced I’m right”

The point is that you’re unable to buy, but you’re not punished for buying. Instead, the seller is punished for selling

It stops the law from punching down on the addicts being taken advantage of (mostly)

According to cancer.org.au

For example, propylene glycol and glycerine found in e-cigarettes when overheated can produce dangerous levels of the carcinogens formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.

Instructions unclear, fingered a dog

To say there’s no direct evidence is disingenuous. Yes, there are no peer reviewed articles that directly correlate vaping and cancer chance, but guess what there also isn’t? Studies that say they’re safe

The reason for this is simple: there’s about a 14 year delay between any smoking changes and lung cancer presenting itself. Extrapolate that to three trials, and you’re looking at minimum 50 years before it can hit shelves

What is known about vapes is that they contain many of the same carcinogens found in cigarettes, which should be a red flag to most people

I said the sale of these items. Not the buying of. Very different prospects you’re assuming I’m lumping into one here

Where did I ever say I wanted to criminalise drug use?

This might be hard to believe, but I’m one of the dozens of people who don’t live in the US

I’m specifically calling out people who downvoted me for saying I don’t like the smell of vapes

I’m honestly with you, I think cigarette and vape sales should be criminalised, smokers are being taken advantage of both by the government and the smoko sellers