I had a desktop with 16GB, never really went over 10, got a new laptop, runing win 11, 32 GB of ram thought it was way overkill, out of the box its running12-20GB, its crazy.

If you where dumb enough to try. Willing to keep going. and put up with our BS, you are favorite DM.

The whole taking people to a foreign island having them rot in a prison “awaiting” “trial”, made our founding fathers quite mad and so they put some little things in our constitution. If there is one thing the founding fathers would still agree on, its that everyone everyone get a fair trial in a timely fashion. If there isn’t enough money, cut some of the corporate kickbacks or maybe try actually collecting taxes from the rich.

yeah, when i’m working I end up leaving everything but my watch in my lunch pail. Half because it can be uncomfortable squatting with it and half I dont want them broken/flung or what not out.

I lept my wallet once while working…never agian. A Kid kept tapping my wallet in my pocket, repeating “Whats in your pants teacher” over and over. I was busy with other children and so had to live with that for like 30 srconds.

This is why more and more people I know are moving to mens working pants. I can fit my cellphone, sunglasses, earphones, wallet, keys, water bottle, a notepad, pen, pencil, sharpie and meal replacement shake in my pockets (I dont like carrying anything in my hand when walking to work)

Okay, but I got a laptop and I miss my desktop because my room is perpetually cold now. My deaktop used to keep my room warm .

…

I don’t know “how bad” it is. but

I know a few people who would 100% move into thier car on campus, either because they are in between homes or it’s thier biggest liability.

Its not even a Uni, just community.

but even in the sticks, the housing crunch is hitting us.

Homes for sale but priced way out of what anyone can actually afford.

This is horrible its come to these sorts of things, but,

when living out of your car is a reality, honestly moving to make it safer for students is good, I think.

My college has a food bank and free showers/toiletries already.

You would think its hostage negotiations, boogieman sticking up companies to add A.I. or enshitify, so avoiding it is a perilous task and “big win”.

Literally, just not changing anything is now considered good.

Just when dubs were getting to a point of not being too bad. Subtitles, especially CC have felt especially bad recently. I would rather wait an extra week or two for good sub or dub then have it done poorly or flat out butcherd with A.I…

This is an extremely well put piece. I have only been playing for about a year and I have seen runaway powercreep. It feels so hard to make a truly fun, intresting deck that can play, when we have just fun wholesome decks its so much more fun. think you make alot of good points. I have also seen with focuses on UB and such, prints get taken and scalped for art, making intresting cards difficult to play.

Best of luck, sad to see you leave.

Okay, that makes sense, not good sense, but it’s not just the inane ramblings of a mad man.

Why? Why does he want greenland?

It will never stop being hilarious to me in the past, A women wearing a pink “dress” and a man wearing blue “pants” would have been ridiculed. Dresses where for men, think about it, men needed free flowing garments, and “pants” where womens undergarments to keep wander eyes, hands and other things away.

So really wearing a pink and purple dress flying free is really just going to the root of manliness.

Is it bad a part of me is curious? Like it would be sour, sweet, tangy, with a dash of onion, right, it could work?

The stuff on yahoo, seems like ai slop, it keeps repeating the same thing, maybe that’s how the yahoo aggregate works idk, im not familiar with it. I was not attacking the Washington post op, I said whats linked, the yahoo thing feels like what id expect from an ai generated article and the Washington post opinion piece didn’t seem to read so much about “gays in concentration camp” but that trump seems to (which I agree with) want to change army culture to a more “Masculine strength” (Like China, russia and NK) where its not about the effectiveness or such of the military but the “strength” of its individual soldiers.

It seems more pointed to trump trying to make his own dictator army, like stalin, or hitler, with the emphasis people seemed to give on the image, I expected more commentary on “how the army should be used to control undesirables” or something, which Im sure trump wants,

but what I read was about trump trying to copy the ultra masculine face of armies in NK or Russia but instead of any discussion or that, everyone it talking about the image, like trump was smart enough to be liking this for the image and not him agreeing “Ya ya, I want army to be stronk”

and really, people think trump is smart enough to use critical thinking and inference to read between the lines and make a conclusion that isn’t spoon fed to him?

did you read the ai slop yahoo article or the Washington post op?

The original article read more to say trump was trying to make a dictator machine, like russia, NKz or china, not concentration camps,

of course trump would still support and share it if it was.

Im not saying he’s agianst putting us in concentration camps, he already has stsrted, im saying this was not our red flag

I don’t know anyone at my work who might recognize that symbol. It looks like an article saying trump want a an army like russia, a toxicly masculine dictator machine. This doesn’t make me think less of trump, 8 years ago when he talked about bombing innocents, I knew he was scum and maybe he crazy. Agian I’m not defending his character, but the yahoo article reeks of ai slop and it just feels like its made to hate for hate sake.

Yeah, society has fallen everyone is out to hate, no one cares to think and form structured opinion, just spouting hateful rhetoric, and yes I know one side is trying to kill innocents while the other is trying to kill the people vying for thier death.

Eh somewhat, In this day and age every symbol has some meaning and most people might not know it. but also trump wouldnt care, he isn’t opposed to nazis.

Agian my comment wasn’t saying trump wasn’t a nazi, just in this one case he, and the author, seemed to not know the meaning of the symbol. but trump would love a toxicly macho army to oppress gays, so he when/if he finds out he wouldn’t care.

Oh, trump is clearly a hiitler fanboy, and he shows this clearly on a daily basis, yes. This is one the rare occasion he might have not known what he was sharing. Of course if the article was about using the army to put gays in concentration camps, im sure he would still support it.