What are you not getting about this situation? She traveled with no issue for 2 decades before this. Why would you need to travel with expungement documents in the first place. That doesn’t apply to travel at all, which is why she was released to get them. Being detained by ICE indefinitely isn’t a “that sucks…but that’s just how it goes sometimes” situation. And that’s why there’s an article about it. But if you want keep licking boots, you might just get to the center. I won’t stop you.

None taken 🙂

So leaving a town to you is equivalent to the travel it takes to leave the country?

Other than distance traveled, the time afforded to travel said distance, and providing the requisite documents needed to cross a border(which she had), yes. The article doesn’t mention how often she traveled to Ireland. Maybe she went every other year to celebrate Christmas with her family.

Especially when you say “I never equated hometown and country. I merely used it as a metaphor” I never did… but did. Your two sentences directly contradict.

No, using a metaphorical comparison does not literally equate the two things being compared. A metaphor suggests that one thing is like another in some figurative or symbolic way, not that they are literally the same.

She thought her stuff was expunged. Which clearly it wasn’t since apparently they pulled it up. If it’s still in the records somewhere…

It says in the article that she presented them with documentation of the expungement of her charges. So if she was able to provide them with documentation, it clearly took place. It shouldn’t take a law degree to figure out that having your criminal records expunged doesn’t wipe any trace of them from government databases. It only removes them from the public eye and prevents them from coming up during background checks for things like housing or employment. The government would still have a record of her prior convictions.

I read my comment back to myself and realized that I wasn’t as clear as I intended to be. I think that what the Reverend is doing here is right and just in the ‘eyes of the Lord’ so to speak. No complaints there. But what I’m meaning to point out is that they are detaining him for not praying the right way while they are (by the word of their own book) hypocrites, praying on ‘street corners’ to be seen by the masses.

Was she leaving the country legally? Yes.

Was she re-entering the country legally? Yes.

Did she ever have a warrant out for her arrest during those times that she left the country? No.

That’s the bottom line. But for the sake of the argument, I never equated hometown and country. I merely used it as a metaphor to show you how travelling to her home country doesn’t qualify her as a flight risk.

Because that’s a broad generalization that’s based on the assumption that being well-traveled makes you more likely to flee the law. Her continual travel to and from her home country has no bearing on whether or not she poses a flight risk. If that were true, anyone that moves away from home and regularly travels by car to and from their hometown should be held in custody.

You’re aware that ‘flight risk’ isn’t a literal term right? Like, it doesn’t mean that there’s a chance they’re going to board a plane and fly away lol

I’m no theocratic scholar, but I grew up catholic and would still consider myself to be catholic despite not practicing by attending church. I’ve also never read the bible, but if I’m not mistaken, I’m pretty sure there’s a passage in there that says prayers should be private acts and calls people that grandstand their praying efforts hypocrites. I certainly wouldn’t say that’s what this Reverend is doing, but I’ve thought for years that christian nationalists were doing explicitly what is mentioned in the bible as hypocrisy.

I did verify.

51% is awfully close for me to have such harsh feelings towards a town investing in clean energy despite being founded due to coal. But I won’t dissuade anyone from sharing that sentiment.

West Virginia boasts the highest coal production per capita in the United States. Living as a descendant of Italian immigrants that moved to the US midwest to mine coal, I’m pissed but this is what a majority of modern miners voted for. We may as well go back to the days of coal miners being the exploited labor of millionaires(billionaires).

I hope this doesn’t come off as being snarky because I’m trying to give genuine advice from the audience you’re probably trying to target but it’d be a good idea to include this bit anytime you’re presenting that graphic:

The fear and greed index is based off of technical measurements of various active markets.

Very broadly, it is telling you whether or not the financial class, investors, stock traders, corporations significantly involved in that, your 401k managers… are acting fearful or greedy.

It does a good job of summarizing what I’m supposed to gather from the index.

I believe you, but having never encountered this index or representation before. I have no fucking clue what it’s trying to tell me. Is it showing whether the public is fearful of the economic momentum or feeling greedy? Greed doesn’t seem like a good thing.

This would be funny if it wasn’t so depressing.

I bet she’s just a moron

You’re the one making claims lol. I’m not going to waste my time arguing with someone paid to spread disinformation. Or maybe you volunteer. I’ve got not idea. Either way, since you made the claim, the burden of proof falls on you. We’ll wait.

Okay less than a day old account with an adjective_noun username. Cause you’re argument is surely being made in good faith lol

I think I understand now. Thank you! I will be changing my paths then. It’s kind of a moot point since I’ll change my paths anyway, but for the sake of my own curiosity, i have a follow up question. Feel free to disregard it if you don’t feel like taking the time to answer.

Hypothetically, my docker setup only allows jellyfin to see /mnt/user as /storage. So jellyfin would report the path to Morbius as being:

/storage/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

when in all actuality it would be:

/mnt/user/hdd1/media/movies/Morbius_all_morbed_up.mkv

My intuition tells me that the file path that jellyfin “sees” would be the security risk. So “/storage/hdd1/…” Is that correct?

Can someone ELI5 this for me? I have a jellyfin docker stack set up through dockstarter and managed through portainer. I also own a domain that uses cloudflare to access my Jellyfin server. Since everything is set up through docker, the containers volumes are globally set to only have access to my media storage. Assuming that my setup is insecure, wouldn’t that just mean that “hackers” would only be able to stream free media from my server?

Then make them vote it down? What is so hard to understand about this? Every impeachment charge is time spent on the floor that forces them to delay voting on other damaging policies. If he’s going to continue flooding the zeitgeist with damaging policies and immoral action, then force his colleagues and constituents to sit down and listen to it in detail. Eventually the end goal doesn’t become worth the sacrifice to get there. There’s a reason no one ever sits through a time share seminar even if its for a free 3 day weekend getaway.

Don’t forget Panama! Trump has actually made me quite a bit of money threatening to invade other countries, so I’m keen on keeping track of all of them. If you’re curious how, it’s simple. It exploits a zero day vulnerability of sports betting markets. You see it all started with the NHL 4 Nations tournament. If the United States is competing in an elimination game against one of the aforementioned countries, bet against them. It doesn’t matter how much of a long shot they are, the opponent always finds a way to win. It happened in the 4 Nations final against Canada, the Concacaf Nations League semifinal against Panama, and the 3rd place match in the CNL to Canada again.