Well now we’re disappearing people to Venezuela. I don’t think we have any moral high ground anymore. Or perhaps ever.

To be more realistic, the entire post needs to be written in the subject line of an email. Man I’ve seen some bad bad communication.

Lol, the copyright protection preventing it is cherry on top.

1337 h4x0r

2024 election was second highest turnout in 20 years wasn’t it?

So these centrists?

https://youtube.com/shorts/fpEjHCW-lLk

And surely you’re aware of the “No true Scottsman” logical fallacy?

You. You call your own allies intellectual cowards. You’re part of the reason the left drives it’s own support away.

What’s my type? You couldn’t have made my point for me any harder than you just did. You just irrationally lashed out at an ally.

Because all we hear about men from the left is that women would rather be with bears, and that men are useless. And that they are oppressing everyone with their privilege.

You tell some poor white kid he’s privileged, he’s not going to be your friend or sympathetic to your causes.

I don’t think messaging from the left has really done anything to win them over. It’s not necessarily that Andrew Tate is telling them anything amazing. He’s just a voice not blaming them for everything.

Fascinating!

Yeah I believe tape is still king there. LTO is working on some 500+ TB tape for the future IIRC.

Notepad++ is good.

Interesting, now you knew right away all sorts of things. And yet here you are still yapping away. So what does that mean, you’re some kinda masochist? Who is trolling who? All I asked of you was to tell me what assumptions I made in my analogy and you’ve exerted tremendous effort to not answer. And you keep bringing up that you weren’t talking to me. That’s not how this format of public discourse works. Are you new to public forums or something? Plenty of people jump in at various points in a thread and it creates many forks. I can draw you a diagram if that would help you.

Oh forgive me for participating in a public conversation, I didn’t realize I hacked into your DM’s between you and that fellow. Thanks for moving the goal posts though. Maybe you should have just said that in your first reply.

You’re totally right though, I’m the defensive one. Your not displaying classic projection or anything of that sort. Yet you keep responding here despite STILL refusing to answer a single question that’s been asked of you.

Here’s what it felt like conversing with you thus far.

“You’re wrong.”

“Why?”

“Because you’re wrong, stop talking to meeeee!”

“Can I have some reasons why you think I’m wrong?”

“Because you’re wrong! What part didn’t you understand?!”

“Can you give me specifics?”

“Reeeeee! I’m not talking to you!”

But you are. You’re just not saying anything.

Yes. Simply not disintegrating while your opponent does is a valid way to win. Perhaps even the easiest way to win.

I was expecting you to not answer a single question I asked earnestly with any detail or specificity.

Yeah, that’s about what I expected. Discussion and understanding between two parties is a two way street. You’ve provided vague refutations with no specifics. Claimed assumptions without stating what those are. I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make aside from telling people they are wrong for feeling a certain way about something.

Reasoning was provided, you seem to be incapable of processing analogies and reasoning. You just did the same thing again. Why is it meritless? Because it’s meritless. You have none of the requirements necessary to even hold a discussion. All you do is circular nonsense.

Here, let me ask you a very simple question and go from there.

What is the job of a congressmen? In the simplest terms you can think of.

You mean like how you go around telling people they don’t blame Republicans if they point out something Democrats do?

I’m not telling you who you are, you are telling me who you are. Tell me how my hypothetical is not appropriate?

That’s not how debating works. You don’t take my analogy and say “that’s meritless.” You prove it to be meritless.

See let me spell it out for you like it’s a standardized test.

In my analogy:

Burglar :: Republican

Cops :: Democrats

Dog :: My trust

Shooting :: voting against my interest

Is that clearer for you?

deleted by creator