I’m just replying in case you need another comment to rant at.

fwiw it sounds like you may need to take a breath too.

Free Couch is a legit banger imo

https://youtu.be/A72HyxRBgco?si=pV_rhwyIVe8dpQUK

You’re very smart. I didn’t realize that until you called someone a goof, idiot and moron, but now it’s very clear that you have far superior intelligence.

Which congress would have voted for it?

Love Scott Manley!

After looking up Cleo Abram I remembered I watched a video where she was hanging out with a paleontologist and that I enjoyed how geeked out she was to find some fossils :) I’ll check out those shorts! Shorts are nice with the kids too. They’re still a bit younger but are curious so that may be the perfect length.

Awesome, thanks for the recommendations!

I’ll have to take a closer look at Nebula and CuriosityStream. I think they come up in ads enough that they wind up on my mental ad blocker so I’ve never looked closely at them :)

<first_half.jpg>

You had me doubting that I knew who Eric Adams is.

Well done :)

Great lengths are gone to, to avoid responding to direct questions. If you can accuse the other person of being in a bad group (bot, capitalist, not actually left, from an instance I don’t like, etc) then you can avoid reflecting on your own philosophies and the flaws that exist in it. Cognitive dissonance avoided and upvotes gained, pretty compelling for our brains.

That your girlfriend?

May Prawn, Shrimp and Holy Crawfish bless you

These are screenshots and don’t prove anything.

deleted by creator

It’s important to me that when someone makes a big claim they back it up. The challenge is that the article doesn’t say what was claimed.

I didn’t make the claim therefore nothing for me to back up.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13344953

“Too much effort to go look for it”

See how I give a source and a relevant quote?

Still being lazy I see

“I’m not lying, I’m lazy”

Dope

Why didn’t you quote the part where they are discussing restricting it?

Yes, I did read the comments.

Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.

An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.

If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.

I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.

How does it result in that?

Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.