Inciting hate isn’t a crime. It’s free speech. He’s not persecuting anyone, just protesting against the religious who want to persecute others by banning people from blasphemy.

If I could I’d have ever parebt who takes a kid to a religious service arrested for child abuse. That’s persecution.

Calling people stupid isn’t persecuting them.

You choose to believe in your stupid religion. You don’t choose to be a race or sexual orientation so you’re making a false equivalency

It’s predictable because the religious are mentally ill and dangerous

Just something to think about when it comes to the influence social media has on society

TikTok has already transformed how Americans communicate, influencing language and behavior in ways that may have broader implications. The Chinese government, known for using censorship and language control to maintain social order and suppress dissent, leverages euphemistic language as a tool for manipulating public opinion and silencing critical discourse.

Phrases like “unalive” for suicide or “grape” for rape dilute the meaning and impact of language, making it easier for powerful entities to control narratives and obscure uncomfortable truths. This process, known as “language laundering” or “semantic bleaching,” strips words of their emotional weight and original meaning, making it harder to address sensitive or urgent issues effectively.

This trend has extended beyond language to visuals, with people obscuring letters or censoring words in pictures and posts—using terms like “s**cide” or “r*pe.” While this may help users navigate algorithms designed to suppress certain keywords, it completely erodes the clarity and impact of critical conversations.

The normalization of this behavior on TikTok has permeated Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and other social media platforms, spreading a culture of diluted language and indirect communication. These practices hinder meaningful discourse, desensitize users to serious issues, and ultimately make it more challenging to engage with sensitive topics in a direct and effective manner. Recognizing and resisting this shift is essential to preserving the integrity of public discussions and fostering authentic engagement.

I image that’s because of the cost. In the US it costs $207 of you don’t have insurance when it was free for everyone until last summer.

Maybe because we don’t see the Ds being any better overall. On a lot yeah, but definitely it everything

They didn’t deserve to win; nobody deserved to win. They did for a myriad of reasons. The democrats did deserve to lose because they don’t run a candidate they support. They run a candidate that’s the lesser of two evils

deleted by creator

I don’t recognise that fixing anything is possible. I’m not hoping for a better future. I’m wanting to end everything.

It’s not just them. I feel the same way about every Church in America too and cheered when Canadians were burning them down and laughed when Notre Dame caught on fire.

Then run somebody people want to vote for instead of someone who’s slightly less despicable than the opposition.

I agree with everything you wrote except having a problem with happenings in Gaza. Israel isn’t being aggressive enough

Removed by mod

They all deserved to lose

At least Trump had people wanting to vote for him whereas Biden/Harris was relying on people to vote against Trump instead of for them

I’m a third party voter who didn’t go to the polls this time for the reasons you’re saying and I can’t see myself ever going again.

The Democrats lost. And deserved to

Just a different kind of evil. Not lesser.

Exactly. I heard more about Trump with Biden in office than I did when he was president before.

She’s one of the people Trump would deport just because of her name anyway