wHAT WOULD rANDALL DO?

The caps lock makes sense! A key logger will get confused when you type your passwords in.

I think it will be, thank you very much.

It looks like @koraro@lemmy.world isn’t around any more, so I guess it’s unmoderated around here (aside from the LW admins).

Can’t the/a bot post here where everyone’s already subbed? If you give me a bit of time, I could get one written.

I’m not understanding why that’s an appropriate name, but maybe I need to learn more about butterflies.

Tbh, I don’t think you really understand how the non-rhotic accent works. In this case, the /r/ would be fully pronounced, as it would be at the start of a word. Say bread, elongate the r and skip the ed part and you have what it sounds like.

If you’re very used to hearing the bunched r, the British version still might sound softer, but even in the USA (where most people use bunched r) it’s still common to hear an r made with the tip of the tongue behind the teeth (upper or lower).

I’m ignoring the other r sounds, but you do find a lot of them across the various regional English accents.

This is a great example - it kinda makes sense if you skim read it but butterflies have nothing to do with butter, just like hotdogs have nothing to do with dogs.

FiveSixElevenSeventeen downvotes and counting…

LLMs are already being used for policy making, business decisions, software creation and the like. The issue is bigger than summarisers, and “hallucinations” are a real problem when they lead to real decisions and real consequences.

If you can’t imagine why this is bad, maybe read some Kafka or watch some Black Mirror.

My friends would probably say something like “I’ve never heard that one, but I guess it means something like …”

The problem is, these LLMs don’t give any indication when they’re making stuff up versus when repeating an incontrovertible truth. Lots of people don’t understand the limitations of things like Google’s AI summary* so they will trust these false answers. Harmless here, but often not.

* I’m not counting the little disclaimer because we’ve been taught to ignore smallprint from being faced with so much of it

I found that trying “some-nonsense-phrase meaning” won’t always trigger the idiom interpretation, but you can often change it to something more saying-like.

I also found that trying in incognito mode had better results, so perhaps it’s also affected by your settings. Maybe it’s regional as well, or based on your search result. And, as AI’s non-deterministic, you can’t expect it to always work.

And it’s can’t bear to (bear as in carry, not bare as in nude).

Everyone complained about the nonsensical AI version, so now we have a sane version to share. This is a good thing.

Given the sub, I was expecting to be surprised that Solarpunk was one of these difficult topics.

I’ve never known how to pronounce it… Arr ziːv? Arr shɪv?

Edit: that’ll teach me to not comment before reading:

it’s pronounced like “archive”

Not that it couldn’t be faked, but here’s the bug report with screenshot: https://forum.cursor.com/t/cursor-told-me-i-should-learn-coding-instead-of-asking-it-to-generate-it-limit-of-800-locs/61132

So they rewrote Nepenthes (or Iocaine, Spigot, Django-llm-poison, Quixotic, Konterfai, Caddy-defender, plus inevitably some Rust versions)

Edit, but with ✨AI✨ and apparently only true facts

Good catch - he’s updated the graphic but this is still wrong.

He’s mixed up the first two diagrams - Pluto should be coloured in for the first and not for the second.