Youre supposed to deal with the anger. Not “let it out” or “keep hold of it.”

Just the real world actually

it’s been nice knowing you all

Has it though?

The risk/reward analysis goes against assassinating the man.

You’re assuming reason and logic. Money addicted billionaire CEO’s are about as rational as crackwhores who need a fix.

I hope they found peace.

Well yes, except obviously not now that you’ve told on them and assasins find them.

But up to this point, prolly, yeah.

With drug money, duh.

Haven’t you seen Breaking Bad?

The drug trade is a trillion dollar industry. Got to wash them somewhere. Where better than at a washer?

Oh I have absolutely no fear calling it as it is; it is most likely Russia or their agents, and the news article and report about Russian sabotage shows.

You don’t understand the irony of me keeping plausible deniability, seeing the subject matter? That’s the joke man.

It’s most likely Russia. Not definitely, but most likely.

Pro-Russian groups have claimed it already, just like I showed.

https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2025/04/195208/pro-russian-hackers-claim-responsibility-for-major-power-outage-across-spain-portugal/

Notice how the report about Russia showed how many attacks they’ve increased to in the past year and specifically targeting infra, and especially a lot of that is focused in Spain? Oh you didn’t, because it you’re afraid of talking about the actual facts?

Doesn’t shock me.

Vanja and their cousins know they can never take on Europe in a fair fight so have to resort to cyka tactics. If you want to do a regular war, I’m in the Finnish reserves and I’ll be there greeting any orcs who wander on the wrong side of the border.

Spain is the third-most targeted country by Russian cyber criminals known as “hacktivists”, according to a council report.

Do you think it isn’t possible at all that this could be intentional and done by Russia or pro-Russian agents?

I admit there are other possibilities, but if I was a betting man…

Where exactly did I say or imply that?

I’m just listing facts like

Russia is engaged in an aggressive campaign of subversion and sabotage against European and U.S. targets, which complement Russia’s brutal conventional war in Ukraine. The number of Russian attacks in Europe nearly tripled between 2023 and 2024, after quadrupling between 2022 and 2023. Russia’s military intelligence service, the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (or GRU), was likely responsible for many of these attacks, either directly by their own officers or indirectly through recruited agents.

It’s not my fault if you read into them.

Edit that’s from the earlier link, directly. But also, https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2025/04/195208/pro-russian-hackers-claim-responsibility-for-major-power-outage-across-spain-portugal/

Edit 2 oh look https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/29/grid-operator-investigates-unusual-activity-spain-blackouts/

Edit 3 the Ruski bots are taking this so hard. Cry more Vanja

Perfect comparison, eh?

Well, having just made pomodoro sauce from fresh tomatoes, according to this recipe from Marco Pierre White, and in it, he says the secret he was told is 50% fresh and 50% tinned.

Yes pure AI slop sucks but the tech is a pretty nifty tool in certain situations.

insane fuck up

The most significant finding from the data is that the number of Russian attacks in Europe nearly tripled between 2023 (12 attacks) and 2024 (34 attacks), after quadrupling between 2022 (3 attacks) and 2023. As noted in more detail below, Russian agencies orchestrated attacks in 2024 against a wide range of targets, from critical infrastructure to transportation targets, using a variety of weapons and tactics, from explosives to blunt or edged weapons such as anchors.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-shadow-war-against-west

Oh max comment depth reached, but you’re still sore for some more public humiliation? Sure, buddy.

You can’t address anything you’ve said in the thread. I love commenting, because I can talk about the argument I made and how everything I’ve said has been correct, while you’ve been fumbling about and now have to avoid literally everything you said because you made stupid mistakes that you’re ashamed to admit.

You didn’t account for inflation, and just looked at the price of gold while arguing it’s value has gone through “exponential” growth? This is hilarious.

You have delusions of not supporting drug cartels when you’re “holding bitcoin” (meaning you’ve probably invested in it after it became popular due to the drug business, but if you had won some from like a esports tournament before it was popular then you wouldnt be supporting drug cartels just by holding on to it, which is why words matter.)

You’ve also avoided telling me what your native language is. Prolly because it prolly is English and you’re just ashamed to admit how stupid you have been. :D

“exponential” indeed.

But hey, I know your ego will force you to come here with some other emoji reply. I’ve seen it literally thousands of times. I’ll keep going as long as you want to. Becuase it’s not me you’re lying to. It’s yourself. You simply cant accept yourself, that you were wrong, you were stupid. It happens. It’s nothing to be ashamed of. You learned new things. Accept it an move on.

Exactly as I called it.

More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.

It’s hilarious.

You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.

So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>

Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.

What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.

You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.

I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.

You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.

How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D

Oh wee got to the point where you’ve just completely shut down and are just having such a tantrum you won’t even inputting words, but have to spam smileys.

“Yawn”, like some kid told me earlier.

“Holding” =/= investing

Using =/= holding.

I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?

“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?

Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.

But you can’t address any of that. You can’t even say anything anymore.

Just keep shaming yourself publicly, because you can’t stand behind your words, you fumble make embarrassing mistakes, prove yourself wrong with your own data. It’s ridiculous.

Let’s see how you’re gonna continue this tantrum.

“Holding” =/= investing

Using =/= holding.

I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?

“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?

Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.

But you can’t address any of that.

Moving goalposts. Yawn.

Literally from the start I said that Bitcoin is propped up by illegal markets, because it is. You asked for a source, I showed you sources showing the value of drug markets which use Bitcoin are in THE TRILLIONS.

That proves my argument. You then started shifting goalposts. And every time you end up saying something silly, like “Bitcoin didn’t exponentially grow in value, or if it did, so has gold”, then try to prove that statement by showing data which proves you wrong. :D

It’s hilarious.

Again, I did. You’re illiterate.

“I said I’m right because me saying how I totally use Bitcoin all the time for legal transactions worth at least like, dozens of dollars, proves that Bitcoin isn’t actually propped by illegal drug markets”

I never said that

I never said you said anything. I implied you implied it, which you did. Or have you not been pretending like implications don’t exist, but you genuinely don’t understand what the word means?

: “Holding Bitcoin indirectly funds crime”

I NEVER SAID THAT STOP MAKING THINGS UP :(((((((((

See how childish that sounds?

Investing in Bitcoin does fund crime. That’s a simple fact proven over and over by what can easily be inferred from the fact that practically all of the transactions in Bitcoin are for drugs, monetary value, I don’t give a toss if you think buying some booster packs makes even the slightest dent in the TRILLIONS that the drug markets are worth. Not to even talk about all the other crime.

You also have to pretend you said Bitcoin hasn’t exponentially grown in value. It has. You claimed “if Bitcoin has, then gold has as well” and showed evidence proving you wrong.

I can’t make anything as entertaining, thanks.

You think currency traders… take Bitcoin… and trade it for… Bitcoin…? Why would they do that?

No, they trade it for money? See this is what I mean. You have to pretend to be a simpleton because your ego doesn’t allow you to accept reality.

No more so than this:

I’m suffering from a slipping rib, so you’re honestly making me go “my sides” because I chuckling at you.

Gold is exactly the same value it was in 1980.

Like I predicted, you think it’s increased in value because the price has gone up, because you simply *look at the numbers. *

Like I said yesterday, this isn’t a debate.

This is entertainment.

I didn’t say that. Now you’re literally just making things up.

Another thing I’ve said before: you pretend like implications don’t exist, because you have to, so that you can avoid the simple things which prove you wrong.

You said “I should check the definition of the word”. I did, and just like I said, Bitcoin has exponentially increased in value, whereas gold has not. Do you understand the difference between “price” and “value”? They might seem similar, but they’re not the same thing.

Except I did. Are you illiterate?

Apparently so, please, do tell me what that thing is that is worth TRILLIONS, or even just billions? No? Can’t come up with a single thing, like I’ve said a dozen times, but can’t address me having sourced that black markets are worth TRILLIONS from a creditable source like Europol. But that makes you ashamed so you have to pretend I’m not right and you’re not just equivocating because you’re avoiding the facts.

You haven’t done that.

Ah yes, because you pretend something doesn’t exist, it doesn’t? Do you play and hide and seek by closing your eyes, because the others surely can’t see you if you can’t see them, right?

I have actually, just more illiteracy on your part. Maybe try going back and sounding it all out?

Pathological avoidance. "Yawn.

You can’t even offer rationale as to your weird delusions would be correct, but still kick and scream that Europol data is wrong.

" No, it’s not mainly used for the drug markets worth trillions that you’ve proved by Data from Europol and it isn’t even relevant to your claim"

I imagine that’s what you look like right now.