I’ve definitely seen both extremes. It’s insane the difference a good PM makes, but they’re rare because of how much pressure they have to handle. It’s an ungrateful job.

Waiting three days just in case !

Coming after encryption… Again.
They have to win once, we have to win every time they pull this shit.

Well that’s his title, and that title is recognised and accepted by more than a billion people

Not any person, the literal representative of Jesus Christ on Earth.

We should spread the news that Vance killed him!

Another example of I don’t care until it affects me from a conservative

I’m sorry, the best they can do is double down

And homosexuality, and mental health, and ADHD, and…

Not shitting outside, and catching or dying from treatable diseases, and income tax if they get a job. If they don’t have to live outside, everyone benefits.

That’s the great thing about trickle down economics, when it goes up, they get richer and we get poorer. When it goes down, we get poorer and they get richer !

I’m talking about Gravelines in France. The first reactor was plugged into the national grid 6 years after construction began. The 6th reactor in 1985.

The EPR2 is already designed, and in service in Flamanville. Flamanville 3 took a long time because we had to rebuild our whole nuclear industry, by lack of political vision back in the 90’s-00’s.

We’re building it again, two by two this time, and hopefully in less than half the time and budget.

I was talking specifically about plant and animal life.

It’s obviously not a paradise, but what I mean is, ionising radiation is literally less harmful to them than human presence. That’s pretty bonkers to think about.
Leave that zone alone, let nature take over again and make it a monument to human hubris.

I don’t think I talked about growing food in irradiated ground though? But, we currently are growing food in polluted ground thanks to fossil fuels (microplastics, coal dust, oil leaks, fracking in some backwards ass countries, etc.).

Our largest power plant, with 6 reactors, was built in 6 years. To this day it provides us with around 6% of our global power requirements. It’s been running for 45 years, producing 32TWh per year with 0 carbon emissions.

It’s like we could build them faster if we wanted to ? We’ve done it already, we can do it again.

Well, good news, because I’m not the one saying it. That’s coming from our Transmission Operator. Everything is detailed in their 992 page report:

https://www.rte-france.com/analyses-tendances-et-prospectives/bilan-previsionnel-2050-futurs-energetiques#Lesresultatsdeletude

What it says is that 100% renewables in France by 2050 is not possible, as the technology is not quite there yet, and also because our energy consumption ever keeps growing.

What they propose is a mix of nuclear and renewables to reach carbon neutrality, then phasing out nuclear over decades.

Completely moving away from fossil fuels with just renewables is a pipe dream. Nuclear is not a panacea and it has its problems but it’s part of the solution to get rid of fossil fuels entirely.

And ironically enough, Fukushima and Chernobyl have not been that bad for plant and animal life. The area around Chernobyl is thriving because most humans are gone.

Sources: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-chernobyl-has-become-unexpected-haven-wildlife

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/060418-chernobyl-wildlife-thirty-year-anniversary-science

Wait until you see the price of climate change and not moving away from fossil fuels then

Now list all the fossil fuels related incidents.

Nuclear + renewables is the way to go to stop the climate crisis in the foreseeable future.

The difference between an IT person and a tech enthusiast