After you’re in the field for long enough, you start to realise that the structure and flaws in the application mimic the structure and flaws of the reporting structure of the organisation

Cutting boards

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37220346/

The link says 2 seasons?

And I can’t find it anywhere?

That is the lamest decepticon transformer I’ve ever heard of

Oh good, I’m not the only one that caught that.

This feels like an intentional “oopsie”

I don’t think he’s necessarily wrong, and I still think that we need to vote with that in mind but…….

This is an intentional “oopsie”

Twice in less than 6 seconds. Like, I really wanted to believe it wasn’t that clear.

It’s so fucking clear.

They can’t possibly remove enough vitamin C for it to be OK with ADHD stimulants though 😔

Fair, I misunderstood what you meant.

They may not have broken their own rules, but maybe their own rules are the problem.

This is what the left is spectacularly good and bad at.

They sell you an image of perfection because that’s what people want to see.

Except it isn’t real, it never is. They sell you everybody as if they’re all sanders.

And then the rug pull. Happens almost every fucking time.

They’re either beholden to billionaires interests, or worse.

You can tell the few that REALLY are good people. The whole party rallies together to stop them. AOC’s recent failed appointment, sanders and Hillary’s backhanded deal to keep him out.

There’s no winning here, the psychopaths have won.

From the people who value “every child” and want to regulate your ability to get an abortion….

Entirely!

But not all systems have that feature.

Beautiful and thoughtful response.

I’m peak ADHD, and I often use the same type of thing

That’s an intentionally rigid view of the world.

The communication gap is that rigidity.

For example, it may say “minimum requirements” on the web form, but let’s put ourselves into the shoes of the person filling it out. Are they SUPER strict on these minimums? Or are they just filling out the form the best they can?

Usually it says sobering along the lines of “ideal candidates” and not “bare minimum” but you likely won’t see that due to overly rigid views on the world.

What if they made a mistake when filling it out, and added things to the “bare minimum “ that aren’t really that harsh a requirement?

It’s a grey area, it’s not a direct lie and you know that, you just don’t like it.

Saying it’s a lie assumes you know the intention of the person writing it, and that they intended to deceive you. And you can’t possibly know that either.

It’s Not a lie and you’re misrepresenting your knowledge of the scenario when you say that.

They’re not usually labeled “minimum requirements”

That may be what you’re interpreting, but they’re usually titled “ideal applicants will have the following” which isn’t the same thing

It feels like the same thing to people with rigid views on the world, but they are not the same.

The data from that study didn’t even compare similar fields.

It compared a Walmart worker to a doctor lol.

It was a wild study.

You look for the cheapest used car that you can.

Leases are really only designed for businesses so that the business can write off value and depreciation early in their balance sheets for tax purposes. Financially they don’t work out great for your average consumer.

Consumers can’t write off those monthly and yearly expenses like a business does.

In fairness, ALL git terms feel backwards at first.

Either way, waiting 3 months worth of work before a commit is the big mistake here.

Squash ftw. Simpler clearer history.