AltMaarri [they/them]

  • 1 Post
  • 53 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2026

help-circle


  • The latest NC article about the Iran conflict contains two interesting testimonies related to the sailors throwing themselves overboard on the USS Lincoln story; one from a recently-retired officer from the US military, another from the mother of a deployed sailor (not on the Lincoln though, on the amphibious assault ship Tripoli).

    Here is the first one, from the ex-mil guy, emphasis mine:

    And finally the truth. This is making the rounds. If the Lincoln has 5,000 people on it and it hasn’t seen land in 38 weeks… they are starving, no packages, rationing coffee, waiting to die from a fucking Iranian hypersonic. They say the number is 6 attempts. Nearly a year at sea no land, etc. the real number of attempts is likely 5-fold or 10-fold.

    You have more attempts at suicide on a NORMAL carrier operation…

    As an officer, like them, I have had to do a number of Army Regulation 15-6 Command Investigations on Soldiers committing suicide. All officers have, it’s a normal function. Suicide is a very real and stable number, too. And that’s while you are still in. They have no clue what’s waiting for them the first night they return home (or wherever)… Suicide is a part of daily life in the military.

    Here’s another example: in the big units, such as 82nd Airborne, 101st Airborne…if the unit makes it 82 or 101 days without a DUI everyone gets a 4 day weekend. Well, they never got over 3 weeks without one, regularly. So they had to increase the denominator to…suicides. Everyone gets a long weekend if we make it to 82 days without a suicide in OUR OWN UNIT…

    Only 6 suicide attempts of 5,000 on an aircraft carrier that is a tinderbox of rage, frustration, and waiting on death? Multiple by 5, minimum. Eventually they end up just telling direct line supervisors if your sailor or soldier kills themself, it’s on YOU.

    And less interesting but still relevant, from the sailor’s mom:

    I believe I told you I’ve been worried about the mental health of these sailors & marines aboard the navy ships at war. Why? Because they removed all chaplains off my sons ship, the USS TRIPOLI. They kicked them off in Diego Garcia, right before their last leg of trip to entering CENTCOM. This pisses me off. I called so many politicians and raised those alarm bells about their removals. I asked how many other chaplains were removed on other ships??? Again nobody would call me back or email me these answers. And here we are, sailors trying to commit suicide at war. Good GOD, Hegseth NEEDS TO BE FIRED! I guarantee you many military families aren’t aware that their loved ones chaplains were removed before going to war. This is a critical asset to have a chaplain while at war!!! … Politicians need to demand his firing and immediately place chaplains back on every navy ship, especially at war…







  • It very likely is the death blow for oil. I am also deeply convinced it comes too late for much of us; much of the science that predicted the effects of climate change was based on models, not historical data (admittedly due to there being no historical precedent of course); models that were consistently ignoring unquantifiable second-order effects from the increasingly changed climate - some of them diminishing the effect, a majority of them increasing it.

    And much of the scenarii - often very optimistic in general, both due to being based on years-old science when published and due to fear of being called an alarmist - from the IPCC also rely on mass carbon-removal at scale, something that has never been demonstrated as either possible or implementable in our current economic system.

    And I would add: I lowkey think every modern leftist discourse should consider and incorporate these facts front and center. We are materialists if anything and should face the facts; I believe there will be massive wake up calls in terms of the consequences in much of the world very soon - this is terrain ripe for change.









  • Maybe this; I quote (I’m assuming I don’t need to CW given the whole thread is but I’ll edit if I’m wrong):

    Computer-assisted self-interviews were completed with a random sample of 163 unmarried Caucasian and African American men in a large metropolitan area. Almost a quarter (24.5%) of these men acknowledged committing an act since the age of 14 that met standard legal definitions of attempted or completedremoved; an additional 39% had committed another type of sexual assault involving forced sexual contact or verbal coercion

    Then again it might be this (depressing I found two candidate studies immediately with a single shitty search):

    In college and community samples, rates of self-reportedremoved perpetration range from 6% to 15%, and rates of sexual assault perpetration range from 22% to 57%

    I didn’t look at either in depth / their methodology; but I wouldn’t be surprised. I am a man and I can count on the fingers of a single hand the amount of men I’ve known in my life that didn’t feel comfortable saying objectifying stuff about women when there were none around.


  • The US could nuke every major city in Iran I guess and end the war that way but I don’t see that happening

    End the war maybe, open the strait I don’t think even nuclear carpet bombing would work. There would be survivors in those missile cities and I suspect they would keep going.

    (all of this assuming an absence of international reaction on top of it, obviously)

    I’m worried that the likely outcome here is the US continues to economically destabilize Iran by killing people and destroying civilian infrastructure until Iran collapses.

    As you said I think the global economy would collapse before that. This is not a stable situation that can keep going for many more months. I still think this is a much worse energy crisis than in the 70s, and that one changed the world. The reserves are still being drawn, and the paltry amount of traffic during the MoU doesn’t change shit. The fact the markets haven’t caught up yet / are being manipulated doesn’t change the facts - in fact it’ll likely make the eventual wall even worse (that or as someone from the previous mega said there’s a huge puzzle piece missing / our or at least my understanding of how modern civilization works is deeply flawed).

    You say the US is fully ready to go that far, but I think that would make it risk collapse itself and the bourgeois there would find an exit before that, like offing Trump - it’d make a good excuse to end the conflict, doubly so if you false flag it towards an easier target (say, Cuba).