Whose house are you protesting outside of?

At worst you’d be offending thin-skinned crackers, but it’s unlikely you’d even offend them if you’re a cracker.

As a cracker: no. Only cringe losers give a fuck about being called cracker.

Edit: and if you’re worried about offending Black people, I think you don’t need to worry, considering the idea that slaves/Black Americans coined/popularized the term.

This take is just incredibly dumb. No one would ever interpret it that way. They are doing this because they are bad people.

Black and white. There is no gray here.

deleted by creator

Surely you recognize that this incentivizes greedy people (who are probably bad parents) to have more children more-so than it incentivizes responsible people?

From my perspective, anyway, I feel that this is more likely to cause more children to suffer.

I think they’re saying the anti-Trump conservatives should call them in on other conservatives.

It’s significantly different in America. I think doordash has different payment structures in Europe bcos of laws whereas, in most of America, drivers are paid next to nothing. It’s like tipping culture with American service workers, except way worse.

So like, inflated prices (set by the restaurant and optional, but often done to make up for doordash’s cut) + delivery fee (pocketed by doordash of course!) + ridiculous tip bcos now I gotta pay this driver’s livable wage.

Door dash really is an unsustainable business. It’s probably gonna tank in the next 5 years, I’d bet.

Did you just stop reading after the first sentence?

Yeah bro, because hating Trump means I want to gargle Biden’s balls. You’re a waste of time.

But, for the sake of others reading this:

Trump said that if hostages weren’t released, there would be hell to pay in the middle-east. In other words, he applied pressure to HAMAS- but not, you know, the genociders.

Additionally, if you click on the source noting Trump’s incoming envoy’s vague “involvement”, you will note that he had no direct involvement in the negotiations. 🤔

Edit: I take it back, tentatively. There was a second reference in the following sentence that elaborated on the Trump admin’s involvement. Interesting. Okay. So it seems that they did pressure Israel to agree to a ceasefire.

We’ll see how long that lasts, considering the last ceasefire lasted 6 days and all.

Acting like Trump is easing up the genocide is fucking delusional.

“Trump is the reason for the ceasefire!!”

Are you intellectually dishonest or just stupid? The ceasefire that has been being planned for months, with literally 0 involvement from Trump, because he literally had 0 authority until like a week ago? Holy fuck.

Ah, the wife zone, an advanced level technique.

I guess it depends on how they identify themself. If they consider themselves cis, then they almost certainly are cis? So the trans label does not apply. If they don’t identify with the gender they were assigned at birth, then they are not cis. Therefore they are trans. No?

I’m not sure that “casting a net” of any size matters. Sure, you can say that there is a spectrum or gradient of gender. But I don’t see how that changes anything. Being trans isn’t a gender. It means that you no longer identify with the gender you were assigned at birth.

Of course, there might be some social stigma associated with being trans that may encourage some people to be offended by this take? Like if you’re a non-binary person you might not really think of yourself as trans due to preconceived ideas and internalized transphobia. Of course I’m not going to go around calling someone trans if they don’t identify themselves as trans anyway, but in my mind I was more answering the question in an attempt to be inclusionary towards people who may want to claim the label but aren’t sure if they fit it.

I’d say anybody who is gender-nonconforming, non-binary, etc, is trans.

They may not always suffer from the same level of transphobia as MtFs or FtMs, but they are no longer identifying as the gender they were assigned at birth. That makes them trans, imo.

Also to add on, pretty sure sterilization is not a 100% success rate? Because of botched surgeries.

And with abstinence, we got Jesus, so…

Different person

“I don’t know how to read”

Idk if this is the same guy, but iirc someone did an interview tell-all where they basically came clean and admitted to all the fucked up shit they helped their administration do.

So yeah, undoubtedly ew, but I’m guessing that’s what they’re talking about.

I guess the difference is that those of us that would argue with you would believe that you are reasonable individuals whereas, shocker, the genociders are not reasonable.

You seem to not be understanding so let me break it down.

Playable - you can play as this

You have a list of playable character options in the character creation section of the phb, and additional ones provided by sourcebooks.

If it isn’t a playable character option, it isn’t playable. RAW. It isn’t an option. It isn’t playable.

RAW. Let me get that through your head.

“Rules as written”

Not RAI.

Not “rules as intended”

RAW.

Written.

If it makes a character into a non playable character option, what rule is suddenly making that character playable? Nothing explicitly states that you can play as a character that is not a playable character option. You have a set list of RAW character options.