

You mean like they haven’t already? I’ve been hearing it for at least a few years now unfortunately.
You mean like they haven’t already? I’ve been hearing it for at least a few years now unfortunately.
Oh no, furries, the most apology worthy state of existence- Wait a minute…
I’ve been seeing it in several places, as comments and replies, unrelated to whatever it’s about, and always from users from discuss.online. Perhaps someone trying to use bots that the instance hasn’t removed yet.
It tends to get shortened to “Trans”, though I could see specifying shortly with something like “Transsex” or “Transgen” for more precise abbreviation.
It’s quite nice seeing other Ace people around, AroAce myself.
Also, that does make sense, I’ve just not really seen anyone use that term for it before now that I can recall.
It’s interesting seeing “nonsexual” as opposed to “Asexual” or something like “Asexual Spectrum”, followed by “allosexual”.
No offense intended or anything, just making mention for visibility.
There’s also black-grey-white-purple, or in direct terms, the Asexual flag, the one you mentioned being for Aromantic. There’s also a specific flag for both combined, or “Aroace”, because you can be one, the other, or both at the same time.
Rings at a very basic level tend to be moons that could be, or could have been, if they were higher in orbit such that gravity wouldn’t tear the moon apart. They can also be from moons or even planets colliding, the debris in the aftermath forming the rings, which if not too low in orbit, could reform into a moon as well, which seems likely to be how our own moon formed.
Yeah, that pretty much sums up how it should be, and it would be great if more people understood that point. That you don’t have to like or enjoy what someone else does, yet you can still have acceptance for them enjoying what safely makes them happier, rather than rejecting things for being different than what’s perceived as “normal”.
Hi, here’s your pretty much useless furry check.
Double meaning entirely intentional, because funny.
Ah yes, gotta love seeing Captain Vor invading other realities just to monologue another time before the cutting in half cycle continues as it always has and always will.
Memes, the DNA of the soul.
“Furry” you say? Wait, do I need to have a drum set to make that joke better? Because it doesn’t quite land right, unlike that cat.
Or just your own tail, like a fluffy pillow, but anywhere.
Yep, that actual chance at learning something instead of being blindly insulted anyway is such a refreshing change.
And especially never admit you’re totally not running Windows on a Protogen because you couldn’t be bothered to modify it.
As an Asexual, can confirm, they’re just making a joke with a text based stutter, not referring to Asexual or Agender, such as in “LGBTQIA+” that generally refers to multiple things under the “A”.
In the latter case, it’s left open ended for inclusivity, rather than arbitrarily excluding other things by specifying.
As for how the original comment could possibly be more inclusive, it’s harder to say exactly, but I can think of something like “Ladies, Gentlemen, and everyone else”, but I’m not exactly great at fancy words… or words in general… but I try my best.
Well not having sexual attraction at all would be asexual, rather than demi-sexual, and even then, you can still find or think someone is attractive without actually being sexually attracted to them, as it’s not really the only form of attraction to exist.
And unfortunately, usually due to any number of personal problems, including but not limited to lack of impulse control, it seems quite difficult for many to not want sex with whoever they find attractive, as I’ve personally seen several times by now.
But of course that’s hard for me to exactly understand given I don’t seem to feel sexual or romantic attraction to anyone myself, despite having or being close enough emotionally to people that either would be reasonably apparent.
And of course, I don’t mean offense toward people in consensual circumstances such as an open relationship with that second line, quite the contrary, as that’s not an impulse control issue, nor an problem if consent is given and done safely, etc.