Willy@sh.itjust.works to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoRemember when it was a big deal if you chose .zip, .rar, or 7z, etc? Now we all have so much bandwidth it doesn't matter.message-squaremessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down17
arrow-up1224arrow-down1message-squareRemember when it was a big deal if you chose .zip, .rar, or 7z, etc? Now we all have so much bandwidth it doesn't matter.Willy@sh.itjust.works to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoSo that makes sense to use now. Rar made sense before 7z existed.
minus-squareBazebara@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago7z was developed in 1999. As far as I know, rar was popular due to was shareware with practically unlimited “trial” and there was an opinion, that paid products are better.
minus-squareThe Ramen Dutchman@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAll the while 7z os FOSS (:
So that makes sense to use now. Rar made sense before 7z existed.
7z was developed in 1999. As far as I know, rar was popular due to was shareware with practically unlimited “trial” and there was an opinion, that paid products are better.
All the while 7z os FOSS (: