• dlove67@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    The deck is only successful because Valve is already successful enough to take the first loss on a console

    This may be true(and I wouldn’t doubt it being the case, at least on the $399 model) but it’s pure speculation on your part.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.orgdeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      There are a dozen consoles like the Steam deck that didn’t have the impact that Steam had. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_handheld_game_consoles It’s not pure speculation. It’s certainly backed by history. Playstation is the other company that tried this and was big enough to release 2 iterations of a failed handheld that was very good on all accounts.

      • dlove67@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I was only talking about your claim that they’re selling at a loss, nothing about success or not.

        We don’t know their BOM so its speculation that they’re taking a loss. (Unless I misunderstood your claim)

        • MJBrune@beehaw.orgdeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Sorry, I mean the overall loss. Not selling at a loss from a manufacturing point but a loss on the development and research of a console. They spent years just designing and building prototypes of the Steam Deck. It is an assumption but I think a fair one to say that they’ve yet to make their money back from those costs to break into the console industry.