☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoThis is not REAL capitalism!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1282arrow-down134
arrow-up1248arrow-down1imageThis is not REAL capitalism!lemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down23·1 year agoexcept that it doesn’t as anybody who’s minimally literate would know
minus-squarePraise Idleness@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down18·edit-26 months agodeleted by creator
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down10·1 year agoYour capacity to ignore the real world is the only thing that’s brainless here.
minus-squareunique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down23·1 year agoAh yes, the suffering of my (great)grandparents is surely imaginary.
minus-squareXavienth@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoNo but it sure was based
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down14·1 year agoAww, I’m sorry your (great)grandparents had their serfs taken away and were forced to become productive members of society.
minus-squareunique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down16·edit-21 year agoDude, all you needed to be defined a “kulak” was to own your own homestead, they worked on their farms themselves. Serfdom had been over for more than a hundred years at that point.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down7·edit-21 year agoKulaks were literal exploiters. Maybe learn some history, you’ll find out why the term means a fist.
minus-squareunique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down14·edit-21 year agoMaybe you should do some reading too. There were no serfs in the 20th century: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_serfdom_in_Livonia And the people considered kulaks by Stalin were often the same peasants, who got pieces of land taken from the actual nobility in the interwar land reform: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_Land_Reform_of_1920
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down6·1 year agoTell us, why were they called kulaks little buddy?
minus-squareHighalectical@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year ago Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
except that it doesn’t as anybody who’s minimally literate would know
deleted by creator
Your capacity to ignore the real world is the only thing that’s brainless here.
Ah yes, the suffering of my (great)grandparents is surely imaginary.
No but it sure was based
Aww, I’m sorry your (great)grandparents had their serfs taken away and were forced to become productive members of society.
Dude, all you needed to be defined a “kulak” was to own your own homestead, they worked on their farms themselves. Serfdom had been over for more than a hundred years at that point.
Kulaks were literal exploiters. Maybe learn some history, you’ll find out why the term means a fist.
Maybe you should do some reading too.
There were no serfs in the 20th century: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_serfdom_in_Livonia
And the people considered kulaks by Stalin were often the same peasants, who got pieces of land taken from the actual nobility in the interwar land reform: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_Land_Reform_of_1920
Tell us, why were they called kulaks little buddy?