• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I agree with everything you’re saying here besides security. Windows 10 and 11 have received hundreds if not thousands of additional security patches that 7 never will receive, which would be crucial to using the internet safely today.

    However, 11 (and to a lesser extent 10) has horrific privacy invasive features built in, so it’s very much a trade-off there, making Linux the only option to have both security and privacy.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Patches are not in themselves security. You are conflating updates with safety, like they want you to. Neither 7 or 11 are secure in any way I would put my weight behind.

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      They’re leaky like a sieve and we just saw a few weeks ago bitlocker has a built in backdoor.

      Its broken by design.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I am in no way disagreeing that Windows 11 is a shit show, and wildly less secure than Linux, but realistically as bad as it is, it’s still going to have less open and known vulnerabilities than Windows 7.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            They absolutely do put on government backdoors, but most people aren’t going to be personally targeted by that, but they are likely to get hit with non-fed malware, like keyloggers to steal accounts, botnets, identity theft, etc.

            Not that it justifies it, fuck Microsoft, but you get what I mean?