MTGZone
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
TheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 2 days ago

New image from "Jumanji 3"

i.postimg.cc

message-square
39
fedilink
54

New image from "Jumanji 3"

i.postimg.cc

TheImpressiveX@piefed.socialM to movies@piefed.socialEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
39
fedilink
  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Not like today, by a long shot.

    I’d say today’s trend began in the 90’s and has exploded since.

    Edit: Some sources

    The proportion of top-grossing films that are sequels roughly doubled in the 2000s / 2010s compared with the 1990s

    Sequels and Remakes in Hollywood, 1991 to 2010

    Letter: Sequels and franchises, still the film business holy grail

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Between 1932 and 1948 Johnny Weissmuller made 12 Tarzan movies.

      Since 1962 there have been 24 James Bond movies.

      Since 1954 there have been 37 Godzilla sequels.

      Since 1979 there have been 45 Amittyville Horror Sequels.

      How many Police Academy Movies were made in the 80s?

      How many Friday the 13th?

      Star Treks?

      Sequels have always been a thing.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        So?

        Take a look at the numbers. There are way more today than ever before, full stop.

        You want to pull out the standouts, the few that did occur, is just a goalpost move trying to make it seem like it was as common as today, rather than the exception - which the numbers prove.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You are moving the goal posts. You started with remember when mindless sequels weren’t a thing to there are more now …

          Sequels have always been a thing and always will be.

        • testfactor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did you read your own sources? They absolutely contradict the point you just made.

          The number of sequels is the same as it’s ever been. Maybe even less.

          It’s just that sequels perform better at the box office and pull in more viewers.

          But there definitely aren’t more sequels according to the sources that you shared.

movies@piefed.social

movies@piefed.social

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !movies@piefed.social

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

  • !television@piefed.social
  • !homevideo@feddit.uk
  • !mediareviews@lemmy.world
  • !casualconversation@piefed.social

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 150 users / day
  • 1.45K users / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 2.66K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.09K subscribers
  • 206 Posts
  • 1.45K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • atomicpoet@piefed.social
  • BoozeOrWater@piefed.social
  • TheImpressiveX@piefed.social
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org