• elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I’ve been thinking along these lines for years. Contrary to what is often said, about landlords being leeches, I believe they provide a service. Not everybody can afford or wants to buy a house, but renting should be affordable.

    Land, however, is a finite resource, and should be taxed accordingly, to redistribute wealth, and normalize the market.

    I find people who invest on housing as a means to enhance their retirement, for example, fine.

    However, hoarding and speculation that leads to inflated markets is not.

    A proggresive taxation on individual owners, say 10-15% on the first 3 properties (maybe one or two could be second residences, why not), 20% on 5-10, 50% on 10-20, for example (I’m throwing numbers around) would make hoarding a diminishing returns game.

    Businesses should have much higher brackets, on residential. Commercial should be taxed, but less so.

    Empty residential should be taxed punitively, and also progressively, and after a certain period, made available to municipalities for social housing.

    Capitalism is good, when there are effective checks.

    Social housing should be a priority.

    There are tons of ways to promote a sane and socially responsible market.

    I believe in capitalism, with effective checks, and redistribution of wealth, progressively.