• sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    no I hate, and I mean hate smart speakers and all generative ai.

    I would 100% be up for a fridge that keeps track of its contents’ expiry dates via qr and could display warnings when things are going off. I hate wasting food, especially animal products (I already feel guilty enough) so if my fridge said the smoked salmon had 3 days left I’d be into that. now, it retaining my data and sharing it with anyone would be a complete dealbreaker so

    • UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If it’s dead, it’s dead. Whether you eat it or not, it won’t change anything. The purchase kills the animal, not the consumption.

      It only makes an ecological difference if you convert the generated calories into energy.

      • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        hm. Id see it differently. kill animal -> eat animal 👌

        kill animal -> let its body rot in the refrigerator while my hungover ass orders thai food is the closest I get to calling something a sin. its a crime against ecology imo.

        I get what youre saying though, I just definitely see it through a different lens

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure, but let’s assume you want to eat x grams of animal products a week. You could either buy them and eat them, or buy them, have them expire, and then you have to re-buy them. The second one clearly sucks more.

      • hans@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The purchase kills the animal, not the consumption.

        the animal is usually dead before someone walks into the grocery store