• Womble@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It wont be Nvidia unless they play things incredibly badly, they’re the only ones making actual profit by selling shovels in the goldrush.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, but dont they also have the largest promisory debt? Havent they loaned the most most money that they dont actually have?

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They “loaned” money to companies that immediately turned around and used that money to buy their products… So they got the money back and are only maximum out the production costs of those units if the loaner can’t pay.

        But if there is a bankruptcy, they’d be at the front of the line to collect

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Cool, in a not super cool way. Nvidia is kinda scummy but the work they do is valuable. I appreciate you dropping the facts on me, but im not sure how to feel about them.

          • Womble@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I’m not a fan of them either, I wish AMD would step up and compete with them better (Just get ROCm into a good place FFS!), but they are definitely not one of the companies most exposed to an AI pop. They’ll stop being insanely profitable but they are not anywhere near the position of openAI and the likes who have massive negative profit.

            • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I guess the question is how much of their revenue is in cash, and how much is in credit from companies that may go bust and not finish paying Nvidia for what they already built and loaned.

              Maybe I’m wrong about how that’s all working.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, but can they handle the collapse of going back to the company before the AI boom? They’ve increased in market cap 5000%, attracted a lot of stakeholders that never would have bothered with nVidia if not for the LLM boom. If LLM pops, then will nVidia survive with their new set of stakeholders that didn’t sign up for a ‘mere graphics company’?

      They’ve reshaped their entire product strategy to be LLM focused. Who knows what the demand is for their current products without the LLM bump. Discrete GPUs were becoming increasingly niche since ‘good enough’ integrated GPUs kind of were denting their market.

      They could survive a pop, but they may not have the right backers to do so anymore…

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Definitely a possibility! But dealing with “only being a normal profitable company” is a very different problem to “oops, we were selling $10 for $5 and VCs have stopped giving us money to burn, and people are using self hosted models too”, which is the possible outcome for the big AI labs.