I thought that, in this case, the headline pretty much summed up the article without being misleading or anything:

Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern slammed Vance, saying he should be “ashamed.”

He wrote on X: “JD Vance grew up on nutrition assistance provided by the federal government. Now, he’s ripping SNAP away from millions of hungry kids growing up in poverty. Pulling the ladder up when you reach the top is not the American way. He should be ashamed.”

So I’m not sure what you’re complaining about. Shouldn’t you make that sort of comment after you’ve read the article yourself? Because I think if you’d read the article, you’d know that the headline pretty much says what’s in the article.