So, I posted a simple Roku fix on Reddit — just explaining how to get actual antenna channels back instead of their ad-stuffed “Live TV” hub.

The post took off fast-within 90 minutes: • 8,000+ views • 12 upvotes • Dozens of people thanking me for the fix

Then… moderators nuked it as a repost.

Sequence of Events: 1. I politely asked what rule I’d broken. 2. Mod replied: “I don’t know, nor is it relevant to your ban.” 3. I joked: “Ok thank you, Paul Blart. 🙄” 4. Instantly → permanent ban + mute.

Screenshots confirmed: no rule violation, just a mod having a day.

Follow-up Attempts: • Tried posting the story in r/help and r/ideasfortheadmins. • AutoMod deleted both — apparently the word “ban” is illegal now. • Tried to share it elsewhere, but at this point Reddit moderation feels like TSA confiscating nail clippers while waving through flamethrowers.

Takeaway: It’s wild when platforms value control over community. I literally helped people watch TV again — and got banned for it.

Give someone a little power, and it goes straight to their head.

The irony? My Roku fix worked. Thousands saw it before it vanished. So somewhere out there, people are happily watching TV — thanks to a guy Reddit decided to erase.

Stay tuned for Volume 2: “AutoMod vs The Word ‘Ban’.”

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why? A lot of people are looking for fixes. Not many actually engage by upvoting or commenting. Seen that plenty of times on tech/help related subs

      • carrylex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay let’s compare this to other platforms like YT for a second, where videos usually have a 10-100 views : 1 upvote ratio.

        Reddit should have similar numbers, but this post has a 700 views/upvote ratio. This way too high and smells extremly fishy.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You’re comparing platforms’s average to something pretty specific. What do you think is the ratio for videos like “How to install Windows 10”?

          • carrylex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Just looked at the first 3 videos I got and the ratio is pretty much 50-100views/upvote lol

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              48 minutes ago

              Now, for the next task, tell me the ratio for engageable content creators like Veritasium.

              Do tell me when you realize the difference between actual content and help videos when it comes to engagement is up to 10x. Music videos might be even higher, but not entirely sure since one user can generate 10 views.

              Let’s also not forget the fact that unlike on YT, reddit likes aren’t a real number, there’s some funky formula and obfuscation.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Upvotes higher than views? Considering how many lurkers there are? Considering even people who engage with a post don’t necessarily upvoter? They said 8k views, 12k upvotes. Even if those numbers are reverse, that’s an insane engagement ratio.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s well known that reddit obfuscates votes on purpose. Views I have no idea.