RomulusCornflakes@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoIf you really squashed them in there, how many Worfs could you fit inside a Galaxy-class starship? Asking for my graduate dissertation for Starfleet Academy.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down13
arrow-up193arrow-down1imageIf you really squashed them in there, how many Worfs could you fit inside a Galaxy-class starship? Asking for my graduate dissertation for Starfleet Academy.lemmy.worldRomulusCornflakes@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareArgentRaven@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 days agoOne. Multiple Worfs would battle to the death, Highlander-style. Just look at Riker. When his transporter clone showed up, they couldn’t even coexist in Starfleet, let alone in one ship. And he’s human!
minus-squareManjushri@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoThere was no stipulation that Worfs be alive.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoIn theory you could fit two if you did a saucer separation. (One gets the saucer, the other gets the stardrive.) In practice, they would still duel to the death over which one gets the battle bridge, which is obviously more honorable. There can be only one.
One. Multiple Worfs would battle to the death, Highlander-style.
Just look at Riker. When his transporter clone showed up, they couldn’t even coexist in Starfleet, let alone in one ship. And he’s human!
There was no stipulation that Worfs be alive.
In theory you could fit two if you did a saucer separation. (One gets the saucer, the other gets the stardrive.) In practice, they would still duel to the death over which one gets the battle bridge, which is obviously more honorable.
There can be only one.