Which rolling release distros use wayland? - Reddthat
reddthat.com
Several rolling-release Linux distributions offer support for Wayland, catering to users who prefer continuous updates and modern display technologies. Here are some notable options: 1. openSUSE Tumbleweed * A stable rolling-release distro known for its rigorous testing and stability. * Supports Wayland, including experimental sessions for LXQt with compositors like Sway and Hyprland. ([9to5Linux][1]) * Ideal for users seeking the latest software with robust stability. ([LinuxBlog.io [http://LinuxBlog.io]][2]) 2. Arch Linux * A minimalist rolling-release distro offering maximum control. * Supports Wayland through compositors like Sway, Hyprland, and River. * Suitable for advanced users comfortable with manual configuration. 3. Manjaro Linux * An Arch-based distro with user-friendly enhancements. * Offers official editions with GNOME and KDE Plasma, both supporting Wayland. * Provides a balance between cutting-edge software and ease of use. 4. Solus * A rolling-release distro with its own package manager and desktop environment. * Offers Plasma 6, which includes Wayland support. ([community.kde.org [http://community.kde.org]][3]) * Designed for users seeking a cohesive and curated experience. 5. Artix Linux * An Arch-based distro that avoids systemd, offering init systems like OpenRC and runit. * Supports Wayland through compositors like Sway and Hyprland. * Appeals to users preferring a systemd-free environment. ([Wikipedia][4]) 6. Chimera Linux * A rolling-release distro using musl libc and dinit. * Supports Wayland with GNOME Shell. ([Wikipedia][5]) * Targets users interested in a minimalist and flexible system. 7. Archcraft * A minimal Arch-based distro with preconfigured window managers. * Supports Wayland through compositors like Sway and Hyprland. * Suitable for users who prefer a lightweight and aesthetic setup. ([Wikipedia][6]) 8. Fedora (Rawhide) * A cutting-edge distro with a focus on free and open-source software. * The Rawhide branch is a rolling-release version that supports Wayland. * Best for users who want the latest features and are comfortable with potential instability. 9. Void Linux * A rolling-release distro known for its simplicity and efficiency. * Supports Wayland with compositors like Sway. * Appeals to users seeking a lightweight and systemd-free environment. ([LinuxBlog.io [http://LinuxBlog.io]][2]) 10. PCLinuxOS * A rolling-release distro with a focus on user-friendliness. * Offers KDE Plasma, which supports Wayland. ([Wikipedia][7]) * Suitable for users who prefer a polished desktop experience. 11. GreenBANG (formerly ArchBang) * A lightweight rolling-release distro based on Arch Linux. * Supports Wayland through compositors like Sway and Hyprland. * Ideal for users with older hardware or those seeking a minimal setup. ([Wikipedia][8]) 12. Kali Linux * A rolling-release distro tailored for security professionals. * The testing branch supports Wayland. * Best for users interested in penetration testing and security research. 13. Chimera Linux * A rolling-release distro using musl libc and dinit. * Supports Wayland with GNOME Shell. * Targets users interested in a minimalist and flexible system. ([Wikipedia][5]) 14. Zorin OS * A user-friendly distro based on Ubuntu. * The latest versions support Wayland, especially on systems with newer hardware. * Suitable for users transitioning from other operating systems. 15. Debian Testing * A rolling-release branch of Debian offering newer software. * Supports Wayland, particularly with GNOME. * Ideal for users seeking Debian’s stability with more up-to-date packages. 16. Kali Linux * A rolling-release distro tailored for security professionals. * The testing branch supports Wayland. * Best for users interested in penetration testing and security research. 17. Ubuntu (with GNOME) * While not traditionally rolling-release, Ubuntu offers a rolling-release variant. * The GNOME desktop environment supports Wayland. * Suitable for users seeking a balance between stability and newer software. 18. Chimera Linux * A rolling-release distro using musl libc and dinit. * Supports Wayland with GNOME Shell. * Targets users interested in a minimalist and flexible system. ([Wikipedia][5]) When choosing a rolling-release distro with Wayland support, consider factors like hardware compatibility, desired desktop environment, and system configuration preferences. Distributions like openSUSE Tumbleweed and Fedora Rawhide offer robust support for Wayland, while Arch-based distros provide flexibility and control. If you have specific requirements or preferences, feel free to provide more details, and I can offer more tailored recommendations. [1]: https://9to5linux.com/opensuse-tumbleweed-now-offers-wayland-support-for-the-lxqt-desktop [https://9to5linux.com/opensuse-tumbleweed-now-offers-wayland-support-for-the-lxqt-desktop] “openSUSE Tumbleweed Now Offers Wayland Support for …” [2]: https://linuxblog.io/linux-rolling-release-distros/ [https://linuxblog.io/linux-rolling-release-distros/] “9 Most Stable Linux "Rolling Release" Distributions” [3]: https://community.kde.org/Distributions [https://community.kde.org/Distributions] “Distributions” [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artix_Linux [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artix_Linux] “Artix Linux” [5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_Linux [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_Linux] “Chimera Linux” [6]: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archcraft [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archcraft] “Archcraft” [7]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCLinuxOS [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCLinuxOS] “PCLinuxOS” [8]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArchBang [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArchBang] “ArchBang”

https://distrochooser.de/en/d5ed36c131b0/

  • You want something that just works out of the box.
  • Your focus is everyday tasks with some programming.
  • You prefer cutting-edge software, but the system itself can be stable.
  • You want a graphical installer and easy GUI management.
  • You like Cinnamon for a Windows-like UI.
  • You’re okay with either pre-installed software or minimal install.
  • You don’t mind if the distro itself has a smaller community as long as the parent distro is well-supported.
  • illusionist@lemmy.zip
    41·
    12 hours ago

    I think it’s astonishing that people still recommend linux based on the DE. As if there was no other difference. The big distros all support the big DEs.

    • Xylight@feddit.onlineEnglish
      1·
      4 hours ago

      It’s irrelevant that every distro supports every DE. The out of box experience matters a lot, you don’t want to force a beginner straight into the terminal just to get a UI they like.

      For recommendations to experienced users, I agree.

    • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
      1·
      8 hours ago

      Most people don’t know what a DE is or how to change it and training wheels are best kept on till they get the hang of all the things.

      Everyone is different and learning should be in small steps rather than leaps. Always ask yourself, can my mom do this?

    • rozodru@piefed.socialEnglish
      31·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t get it either. I mean the distro at the end of the day really doesn’t matter. like ok, which way do you want to type a line in a terminal to download something. you want Debian, Arch, Fedora, Nix or Gentoo.

      People always suggest Mint and I don’t get why. I mean I could have Cagebreak or Herbstluftwm on Mint…is it still new user friendly? no? then it’s not the Distro it’s the DE.

      Throw Cinnamon or KDE Plasma on Arch with a Distro Manager GUI, boom now that’s new user friendly.

      It’s the DE that’s important, the Distro is whatever.

      • Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world
        1·
        8 hours ago

        Just cuz KDE works well on one distro, doesn’t mean it works well on others (idk why it’s weird like that). Another thing is that sometimes it’s nice when everything is setup out of the box with no need to configure anything except theme and wallpaper.

        I get most Linux users like to rice the crap out of there systems, but sometimes you just need to get work down and don’t have time for that.

        Also also, there are times software maintainers don’t always release versions for your distro and not everyone wants to compile things themselves, or rewrite scripts cuz author only made it with Debian distros in mind, or something.

      • Ŝan@piefed.zipEnglish
        22·
        9 hours ago

        People suggest Mint because it’s a solid, easy-to-use installer, is based on a stable distribution, and requires no fiddling wiþ etc files to get up and running. It’s þe no-brainer of Linux distributions.

        Maybe þere are oþers, but none are so widely known to be plug-&-play as Mint, because þat “new user” experience is what þe project focuses on.