• IndridCold@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I say we do this. The ONLY reason Canada put tariffs on Chinese EVs is because of the US - back when the US was our friend. Those days are well over.

    From what I understand, Chinese EVs out perform the US ones (charge quicker with longer range) and are way cheaper.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a security concern with Chinese EVs.

      They’re far too computerized, and connected, at this point.

      The last thing I want is the ability for the Chinese government to disable a quarter of the Canadian vehicle fleet if they decided they wanted to. Or potentially even worse than disabling them in some cases.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is possible with most modern vehicles today. They nearly all have cellular modems built in and very few have the driving related systems separated from the ‘infotainment’ crapware. 2014ish jeeps could be bricked by OTA updates to the fucking radio, there’s a good Defcon talk about it

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, but I’d much rather have the company controlling the official switch not be directly under the control of China.

          The US is only marginally better right now, but they have less incentive to do it and less control of their car companies.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        American cars are the same, and China hasn’t joked about making us their 24th province.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m far less concerned about the American government disabling vehicles in Canada. If America wanted to take us over we couldn’t even dream of stopping them.

          China could benefit from causing problems though.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            At this point it’s not even inconceivable for Americans to do something as retaliation for, say, Dougie Ford shutting down electricity. Or use it as a bargain chip as part of playing it tough in a negotiation.

            Or forget the taking us over bit. It’s not the taking over that is hard for them, it’s keeping control. We can very effectively resist and make the occupation extremely costly for them. Every bit of leverage they have makes this harder.

            Fuck, is it that inconceivable that if they go full Gilead they wouldn’t start shit like controlling whether you can drive your car to an abortion clinic?

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This reasoning is weird. Was buying American goods or UK goods or German goods funding Israel’s genocide in Gaza??

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Are you asking me or the person I’m responding to? They are the one that started talking about buying things as funding genocides. I merely questioned the consistency of applying the principle.