Im not 100% sold but it was interesting.

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You herd the group of cats that are all my friends, family, and work colleagues and get them to use a standard app that’s not Facebook Messenger. 😆 You’ll have to forgive me if I don’t wait.

    RCS, seriously? Not sure how that is outside the US, but it’s a total non-starter if you’re not using your phone in a Google-blessed configuration. Rooted? No RCS for you. No Google Play Services? No RCS for you. Don’t like “Google Messages” and want to use any other messaging app? Believe it or not, no RCS for you.

    Maybe if the day ever comes where Google is excised from the RCS infrastructure it’ll be a viable option, but as it stands ( at least in the US where I have experience with it), it’s definitely not a replacement for SMS.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      You herd the group of cats that are all my friends, family, and work colleagues and get them to use a standard app that’s not Facebook Messenger

      So much this, it hurts. Signal removing SMS support was the biggest setback to getting my friends and family to adopt secure messaging. I had such a huge percentage of people actually switching because they could use just the one app, and then Signal went and fucked it all right to hell! Now I’m back to a handful of contacts on Signal.

      • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I mean, RCS as a technology is fine. Just needs Google and Apple out of the mix. If it wants to replace SMS, it needs to be a carrier-run system.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It still requires lock-in to a device. That’s utterly antithetical to network design concepts established in the 80’s.

          It violates the OSI model of layer independence.

          • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I agree, but so does SMS/MMS. I’m only comparing apples to apples as far as the default messaging experience on the device is concerned.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Let’s hope that the alternatives stay legal and uncompromized.

    And I wish most people my age that I personally know gave enough of a shit to install a messaging app.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’ll be hard to outlaw XMPP. or at least enforce it in any meaningful way that won’t break other things. And it supports encryption, though imperfectly.

      One positive, it’s pretty simple to self-host and apply whatever extensions you wish.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        People who would rather use Facebook Messenger than Signal definitely aren’t going to use XMPP. XMPP clients just aren’t user-friendly enough, especially if you want to use encryption and you and your communication partner don’t use the same client.

        And I’d assume, if they make E2EE illegal, that E2EE XMPP would also be illegal. Maybe the US would specifically ban Signal, but the EU would definitely be more thorough about banning E2EE.