• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The concept of someone having enough money to rent but not enough to own is ghoulish in the first place.

    Don’t think you’re being a little dramatic? There are many more costs involved in owning a house than the mortgage payment.

    If my landlord can pay $<1,200 for this house’s mortgage and upkeep, and I can pay $1,200 a month for the right to sleep in it, then we should simply cut out the middle man and have me pay that $<1,200 a month for mortgage and upkeep directly.

    You’re paying for not having the responsibility to pay for any maintenance/repairs upfront, and for having the ability to easily pack up and move on short notice. If the roof suddenly needs replacing, that’s $9500 on average that you have to pay right now.

    Chances are, if you’re financially stable enough that you’d be able to handle things like that without it being a financial catastrophe for you, then you do have enough money to own.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t think you’re being a little dramatic? There are many more costs involved in owning a house than the mortgage payment.

      Yes, and my rent covers literally all of them. Again, it has to, or else my landlord would be renting this house at a loss. I don’t want the opportunity to pack up and move on short notice. I’ve lived in this city since I was born, and I intend to die here. I should not be forced to pay a premium for a feature I will never use.