LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1740arrow-down114
arrow-up1726arrow-down1imageCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square161fedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down6·1 day ago“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·1 day agoYou sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·22 hours agoWell given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·1 day agoThere’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoFunny. But that’s not how the market works.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoI dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoThis again. sight
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIt would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI. /s
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
big if true
I dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
This again. sight
It would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.