• HatchetHaro@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago
    1. why limit to women?

    2. where’s the due process?

    3. wouldn’t this open an avenue for getting away with murder using rape as an excuse and therefore also degrading the severity of actual rape cases?

    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago
      1. because I’m a woman
      2. they lost the right to due process after committing rape
      3. you commit political violence, expect someone to bash back. don’t be a fascist, and you won’t have to worry about dying
      • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        very well. i shall now falsely claim rape to murder someone, and since the victim has no way of proving innocence (on account of being dead), they would have lost the right to due process anyways, and then i get away with it scot-free since it is now legal for me to kill my “rapist”.

        • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          idk, to me it just sounds like you’re rabidly defending the right of rapists to escape any consequences.

          the “false rape agenda” is an incel fascist rhetoric pushed by MRA activists so thank you for outing yourself as one of their enablers

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            the “false rape agenda” is an incel fascist rhetoric pushed by MRA activists

            Maybe today. But you said you wanted to do away with due process for murder. What do you think due process is?

            Your position here is every bit as ludicrous as Trumpists saying “immigrants don’t deserve due process because they entered the country illegally”. Ignoring the fact that some of the people being deported had a legal right to be there that could have been proven if they were given their basic due process rights.

            • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              there is no due process in actions not carried out by courts. what the fuck are you shitlibs not getting about this? self-defense doesn’t need state backing, that’s how its always been.

              this is the same as MAGA getting mad that social media platforms are banning them for hate speech and invoking a first amendment violation. you can’t violate someone’s free speech if you’re not the literal government

          • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            oh, no, i’m just massively in support of legally killing anyone i want, so thanks for giving me an easy and legal way to do it!

            • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              sounds like there was nothing stopping you beyond social decorum so you can’t blame that on others. that’s all you baby